2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: F

Companies starting with F that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

2.5K companies starting with "F"

Showing 2.5K–2.5K of 2.5K

Company Complaints
further damaging my financial standing and perpetuating harm. 2
further delaying potential resolutions. XXXX informed me that the relevant fraud prevention team was on leave over the weekend 1
further delaying this process and inconveniencing my current and former landlord during their workdays with a last minute 1
further demonstrates the systemic disregard for consumer rights and legal obligations. American Express never informed of my right to exercise my nondisclosure option. Additionally 1
further demonstrates the systemic disregard for consumer rights and legal obligations. XXXX XXXX never informed of my right to exercise my nondisclosure option. Additionally 2
further demonstrates your disregard for consumer rights. 1
further demonstrating continued court recognition of risk and enforcement of separation. 1
further demonstrating their lack of compliance with FDCPA standards.,,Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation,PA,151XX,,Consent provided,Web,2025-07-21,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,14778783 1
further demonstrating their reckless disregard for Plaintiffs rights and vulnerability as a consumer. 1
further depleting the escrow balance. 1
further destroying my credit. The people I have spoken to are unknowledgeable and often say the same thing which tends me to believe everything they same is scripted. If I am late on a payment 1
further diminishing my perception of my value 1
further emphasizing the high likelihood of data compromise and the danger of these bureaus relying on unverified public records. 2
further entrenching me in a cycle of debt and financial uncertainty. 1
FURTHER ESCALATES MY DTPA CLAIM TO A WILLFUL AND WANTON STANDARD BUT NOW ADDING WITH MALICE AFORETHOUGHT. HERE XXXX XXXX NEW OF MY COMPLAINT 1
further evidence of XXXX lie. 1
further evidencing systemic program deficiencies and consumer harm. 1
further exacerbating medical conditions. 1
further exacerbating my frustration and disappointment. 1
further exacerbating the damage to my credit profile. 1
further exacerbating the issue. 1
further exacerbating the negative impact on my credit profile. This continued reporting of an alleged debt without validation not only violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ) and Uniform Commercial Code ( UCC ) but also disregards my rights protected by law. 1
further exacerbating the situation. 5
further exposing myself to potential identity theft risks through an unverified platform. Ironically 2
further highlighting the need for a thorough review of your handling of P2P-related fraud claims. 1
further highlighting their unwillingness to engage in good faith and resolve legitimate consumer grievances. 1
further highlights the severity of the inaccuracies. Additionally 3
further holding up the closing of our loan. 1
Further I tried NOT to double dip although the PayPal invoices are not clear on that matter.,,Paypal Holdings 1
further improving utilization and credit score. Instead 1
further increasing my balance. 1
further indicating a back-end issue with the bank 's data feed 1
further indicating a lack of transparency and proper record-keeping. 1
further indicating financial discrepancies. Prior to the hack on XX/XX/XXXX 1
further inflating the loan balance and increasing my financial obligations. These discrepancies were not disclosed at the time of signing 1
further lowering my available credit limits. 1
further making this look like a typo or error on their part that should not be my responsibility. 1
further proving that this inquiry is fraudulent. If you can not produce legally verifiable proof of authorization 11
further proving your mishandling of this account. I am an Equifax Data Breach victim 3
further questioning the reliability of Credit Karmas reporting. 1
further questioning the reliability of XXXX XXXX reporting. 2
further reinforcing the false appearance that the vehicle is still in my possession. 1
further requests were made to review my aunt 's statements. Subsequently 1
further substantiating my claim. 9
further support the need for verification and deletion if these stem from invalid contracts or fraud. 1
further supporting my eligibility for reimbursement. 1
further supporting that the account was created by an unknown third party. 1
further supporting that XXXX engaged in unlawful practices related to my account. 3
further undermining the legitimacy of the reported balance. 2
further validating previous in ongoing class action lawsuits ; Thank you for the recent communication regarding the account referenced above in which you requested copies of all audio recordings and transcripts of all phone calls beginning ( XXXX ) date of and through ( XXXX ). The copies of all requested recordings and transcripts have not been provided to you because production would create an undue burden on PHH. '' -We are being denied our right to information 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter F that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related