2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: A

Companies starting with A that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

29.6K companies starting with "A"

Showing 8.6K–8.6K of 29.6K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
and Equifax are telling my private information to the public people without my consent. I have private information being publicized. A consumer reporting agency can not furnish anything unless it was initiated by the consumer 1
and Equifax can not produce current and accurate documentation from the furnishers confirming the validity of the late payments 1
and Equifax Credit Bureau. Different addresses 1
and Equifax credit limit as XXXX 1
and Equifax Credit reports showing disputed/fraudulent information Identity theft documentation Evidence of improper reinsertion Timeline of violation events Documentation of harm suffered LEGAL AUTHORITY : This complaint is filed under the CFPB 's supervisory and enforcement authority over credit reporting agencies pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 5564 and the Consumer Financial Protection Act. 3
and Equifax did not do a proper investigation into my disputes 3
and Equifax did NOT use proper procedures to verify the information being reported. Furthermore 1
and Equifax failed to notify me within 5 business days of re-inserting the disputed account. The notice I received did not provide sufficient reasoning or evidence that the information was verified accurately. 1
AND EQUIFAX FROM REPORTING THE XXXX XXXX ACCOUNT ONTO MY CONSUMER CREDIT REPORT. According to 15 U.S.Code 6805 - Enforcement ( a ) In general ; This subchapter and the regulations prescribed thereunder shall be enforced by the BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION 1
and Equifax has chosen not to eliminate the adverse entries from my credit report. In support of my claim 1
and Equifax has no right to continue reporting them without written proof that I authorized each one. This is a direct violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act 1
and Equifax has not substantiated the debt 1
and Equifax has reported XX/XX/XXXX. 1
and Equifax has that it was last active on XXXX. This is all inaccurate information being reported by the credit bureaus.,,EQUIFAX 1
And Equifax has unlawfully bought 3
and Equifax have failed in their required duties and examination procedures to verify the accuracy of the information reported to them from XXXX XXXX XXXX I have listed below the exact federal codes of the Fair Credit Reporting Act 1
and Equifax have failed to correct this inaccurate reporting. 1
and Equifax have failed to delete it after multiple disputes. 1
and Equifax have violated my rights. 4
and EQUIFAX INC. 1
AND EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC do not have my consent to furnish this information and they surely do not have my written consent. Any and all consent to XXXX XXXX 1
and Equifax is MISUSING THEIR CANCELED MEMBERSHIP FEES. 1
and Equifax is reporting high credit as XXXX 1
and equifax is reporting XX/XX/XXXX. XXXX is reporting date of last payment XX/XX/XXXX 1
and Equifax must remove these inquiries from my credit report.,,EQUIFAX 1
and Equifax reports as settlement accepted on this account or paid account/XXXX balance. As you can see on the pictures 1
and Equifax reports XXXX Payment Date as XX/XX/XXXX. While also posting payments past due dates of XX/XX/XXXX to XX/XX/XXXX. Account was Charged Off and does not have another scheduled due date. It should not be reporting as late payment every month 1
and Equifax reports. 2
and EQUIFAX should not include payment history 4
and Equifax shows mostly OK with one 30day late. These discrepancies demonstrate that the account is factually incorrect 1
and Equifax still does not want to do anything.,,EQUIFAX 1
and Equifax to notify them that the hard inquiry on my account is fraudulent. I was told I will need to wait about XXXX days for the inquiry to be removed from my report this way. 1
And Equifax to Report ANYTHING ON MY CREDIT. Per the Fair Credit Reporting Act as a Federally Protected Consumer I Am Now OPTING OUT of ANY & ALL authorization that I the Consumer may have Given you Written 2
and Equifax who also did not provide any of the requested information per the guidelines of the FCRA. Therefore the Item in question should have been removed 1
and Equifax. 4
and Equifax. These discrepancies violate FCRA 607 ( b ) ( maximum possible accuracy ) and 611 ( failure to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation ). 3
and Equifax. This action must be completed without delay to preventfurther damage to my financial reputation and rectify the negligent mishandling ofmy account. - Vicarious Liability and Employee Misconduct : - Under the legal doctrineof respondeat superiorXXXX XXXX is vicariously liable for the negligent andmisleading actions of its employees. This includes incorrect payment processing andfalse assurances of error correction 1
and Equifax.,,EQUIFAX 1
and Equifaxs failure to undertake a manual investigation in my case clearly demonstrates its failure to comply with federal requirements. 1
and Equinox to no avail.,,EQUIFAX 1
and erosion of trust in the integrity of the credit reporting system. 3
and erroneous information. 1
and error logs. If that XXXX corresponds to Teslas internal servers rather than my device 1
and error message. 1
and errors 1
and errors that continue to harm my credit profile. Despite my efforts to resolve these matters directly 6
and escalate issues ourselves simply to obtain basic updates. Meaningful responses were only provided after escalation to management. 1
and escalating fees without account access 1
and escalating to PenFed in XX/XX/XXXX 1
and escalation to Coinbases board if the issue is not resolved immediately.,,Coinbase 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter A that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →