2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: A

Companies starting with A that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

29.6K companies starting with "A"

Showing 5.6K–5.6K of 29.6K

Company Complaints
and after the typical hold 1
and after they help me with that 1
and after waiting 1
and after waiting for 30minutes 1
and after XXXX or XXXX requests 1
and AG enforcement VII. AFFIDAVIT DECLARATION I 1
and again 7
and AGAIN a customer support representative confirmed a duplicate charge and filed an appeal on the dispute on my behalf. 1
and again asked for more help. I received no response. 1
and again at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX in TX for {$16.00} On XX/XX/2018 two purchases were made. 1 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX for {$580.00} 2 ) XXXX XXXX for {$1000.00}. 1
and again BMO said they didn't receive my documents 1
and again changed the subject and avoided the topic. 1
and again contrary to the express requirements of TILA 2
and again denied I had any recourse. 1
and again for the record 2
and again from XX/XX/XXXX to XX/XX/XXXX 1
and again highlighting the lack of transparency 1
and again I am demanding to be provided documents such as debt validation 1
and again I told him nothing. He asked when my next payday is 1
and again I was denied. 1
and again i was told all my document was received i will getting rehabilitation agreement within 10 days. 1
and again I was told the same thing about his supervisor being unavailable. I explained that I am tired of all the lies and the same responses and that this is unacceptable. I said I would get an attorney involved 1
and again in XXXX Respectively. 1
and again investigate what I might be able to do in order to remove this collection and better my credit. This time I spoke with a very kind gentleman named XXXX 1
and again on XX/XX/20 when I received the correspondence about the same creditor ( XXXX XXXX XXXX ) that I am currently paying on as we speak. Further more 1
and again on XX/XX/2020 I sent them their payment with a XXXX money order sent CERTIFIED PRIORITY MAIL along with yet again correct banking info at a cost of {$15.00}. Today on XX/XX/2020 after them calling me again requesting payment and saying I was in default 1
and again on XX/XX/XXXX 1
and again on XX/XX/XXXX when I received the correspondence about the same creditor ( XXXX XXXX XXXX ) that I am currently paying on as we speak. Further more 1
and again on XX/XX/year> 2
and again received a message that they were too overloaded.,,Maximus Federal Services 1
and again requested a replacement. Only after this second intervention did the fraudulent activity stop. 1
and again she denied me my own check back. 1
and again stated that I needed to fill out a police report. 1
and again that's a one-sidedness that consumers do not appreciate at the time they agree to the User Agreement. 1
and again they confirmed that I did. I also have a copy/printout of this conversation as affirmation. 1
and again today 1
and again warned 1
and again was not explained. I have a XXXX XXXX son. I would never agree to something like this. When we went in to sign these documents our attorney was speaking so fast that we did not know or understand and when we asked questions she would get frustrated and say we needed to hurry up. I have another appointment. My husband was very sick ; he was XXXX. At this point 1
and again we are stating that Freedom Mortgage is in fact responsible for this mistake. One must ask the question 1
and again {$2200.00} on XX/XX/XXXX. 1
and against my best interest 1
and against the intent of this law. 1
and AGents and we request enforcement action and prosecution against all of them for wasting our time 2
and agents could not just dump me into a queue for managers. This issue needs to be remediated retroactively so that my incorrect delinquency can be corrected and reported back to the credit bureau. Its not fair that these items that were out of my control has in turn caused me to bear the consequences when in fact I have made every effort to get my escrow resolved and have never failed at making my payments 1
and agents refused to reopen it and gave no rationale. 1
AND AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT. BOTH XXXX AND XXXX HAVE REMOVED ALL FRAUDULENT ACCOUNTS OF XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX REPORT. TRANSUNION CONTINUES TO KEEP FRAUDULENT INFORMATION ON CREDIT REPORT AFTER ALL LEGAL DOCUMENTATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED INCLUDED IDENTIFICATION. CONSUMER 'S INFORMATION HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN XXXX 1
and aggressive debt collection tactics ( Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ) ( Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ) ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ). 3
and aggressively pursue me for payment. This conduct constitutes multiple violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) 3
and agitated. Upon answering the phone 1
and agreed to cancel the remianing transfer 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter A that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related