2026 data Public-data reference. official source

XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. )

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. )'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Basi. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
Basi
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since Basi

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. ) complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. ) complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). constitutes negligence: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% constitutes negligence 100.0%
  • constitutes negligence 1 100.0% 0% relief

How XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. )'s 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
constitutes negligence and violates the Electronic Fund Transfer Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1693 et seq. ) 1

Top States

State Complaints
which require robust measures to prevent fraud and unauthorized access. The false claim of a provisional credit and subsequent account closure with an erroneous negative balance exacerbate the harm 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
despite my repeated requests and evidence of card cloning 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. )

XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. ) has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Basi, and the most recent logged activity is Basis for , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. ) reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "constitutes negligence and violates the Electronic Fund Transfer Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1693 et seq. )", and the single most common underlying issue is "despite my repeated requests and evidence of card cloning".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. ): cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. ) have?

XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. ) has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. ) respond to complaints on time?

XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. ) has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. )?

The most common issue reported against XXXX violate the Bank Secrecy Act ( 31 U.S.C. 5318 ( g ) ( 2 ) ) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq. ) is "despite my repeated requests and evidence of card cloning" in the "constitutes negligence and violates the Electronic Fund Transfer Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1693 et seq. )" product category.

Related