Total complaints
3
Filed since Also
2026 data Public-data reference. official source
with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX
3 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
3 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX's complaint history from CFPB public records. 3 consumers have filed complaints since Also. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
3
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
Also
Since
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX complaint mix by product
- the above 2 66.7% – 0% relief
- the above 1 33.3% – 0% relief
How with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX's 3 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Complaints by Product
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the above closed accounts were involved in a fraudulent student loan debt relief operation by a company named XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. I was a victim in this fraudulent student loan debt relief scheme ( see attached Federal Trade Commission Email and United States Department of Justice Articles ). In the court case United States v. Brandon Demond Fere | 2 |
| the above closed accounts were involved in a fraudulent student loan debt relief operation by a company named XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ). I was a victim in this fraudulent student loan debt relief scheme ( see attached Federal Trade Commission Email and United States Department of Justice Articles ). In the court case United States v. Brandon Demond Fere | 1 |
Top States
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| XXXX collected advance fees from me to phonily prepare and submit documents to supposedly enroll me in U.S. Department of Education programs and promised to lower my student loan payments and eventually have my debts forgiven | 3 |
Top Issues
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| XXXX XXXX | 3 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
What the CFPB Record Shows About with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX
with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX has accumulated 3 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 3 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Also, and the most recent logged activity is Also, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "the above closed accounts were involved in a fraudulent student loan debt relief operation by a company named XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. I was a victim in this fraudulent student loan debt relief scheme ( see attached Federal Trade Commission Email and United States Department of Justice Articles ). In the court case United States v. Brandon Demond Fere", and the single most common underlying issue is "XXXX XXXX".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Consumer Guides
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Related Data
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
PlainBankData
Bank financial data — deposits, assets, branches, and regulatory filings for FDIC-insured institutions.
PlainAdvisorCheck
Financial advisor records — SEC and FINRA registration, disclosures, and disciplinary history.
PlainCU
Credit union data — financial performance, membership, rates, and NCUA regulatory information.
PlainInsurer
Insurance company data — financial strength, complaint ratios, market share, and state licensing.
PlainLender
Mortgage lender data — HMDA loan originations, approval rates, interest rates, and lending patterns.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CFPB complaints does with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX have?
with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX has received 3 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Does with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX respond to complaints on time?
with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
What is the most common complaint about with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX?
The most common issue reported against with assistance from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Between XXXX and XXXX is "XXXX XXXX" in the "the above closed accounts were involved in a fraudulent student loan debt relief operation by a company named XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. I was a victim in this fraudulent student loan debt relief scheme ( see attached Federal Trade Commission Email and United States Department of Justice Articles ). In the court case United States v. Brandon Demond Fere" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
