which was erroneously or fraudulently added into my agreement at {$17.00} a day or a total of {$450.00}. It was XXXX 's agent who apparently marked the X for 'Agreed ' for those erroneous items on his computer screen ; I never even saw those items because he had not shown me a copy of what he was typing in on his keyboard. I did not sign on the page of the rental agreement that contains those items

What the CFPB Record Shows About which was erroneously or fraudulently added into my agreement at {$17.00} a day or a total of {$450.00}. It was XXXX 's agent who apparently marked the X for 'Agreed ' for those erroneous items on his computer screen ; I never even saw those items because he had not shown me a copy of what he was typing in on his keyboard. I did not sign on the page of the rental agreement that contains those items

which was erroneously or fraudulently added into my agreement at {$17.00} a day or a total of {$450.00}. It was XXXX 's agent who apparently marked the X for 'Agreed ' for those erroneous items on his computer screen ; I never even saw those items because he had not shown me a copy of what he was typing in on his keyboard. I did not sign on the page of the rental agreement that contains those items has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to I wa, and the most recent logged activity is I was not , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, which was erroneously or fraudulently added into my agreement at {$17.00} a day or a total of {$450.00}. It was XXXX 's agent who apparently marked the X for 'Agreed ' for those erroneous items on his computer screen ; I never even saw those items because he had not shown me a copy of what he was typing in on his keyboard. I did not sign on the page of the rental agreement that contains those items reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "but having given my instructions to the XXXX agent", and the single most common underlying issue is "I was told to sign in the box of a small automated 'credit card signer box ' which was attached to the counter. As I recall".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating which was erroneously or fraudulently added into my agreement at {$17.00} a day or a total of {$450.00}. It was XXXX 's agent who apparently marked the X for 'Agreed ' for those erroneous items on his computer screen ; I never even saw those items because he had not shown me a copy of what he was typing in on his keyboard. I did not sign on the page of the rental agreement that contains those items: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.