Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows which I then did. Because it was a duplicative payment to the same vendor's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since On X. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How which I then did. Because it was a duplicative payment to the same vendor's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| due to a personal miscommunication | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the stopping of one would trigger ( according to the bank ) the stopping of both. I said ok and asked them to stop the payment. | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| in the amount of {$9300.00} ( due to the duplicative payment | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
which I then did. Because it was a duplicative payment to the same vendor has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to On X, and the most recent logged activity is On XX/XX/X, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, which I then did. Because it was a duplicative payment to the same vendor reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "due to a personal miscommunication", and the single most common underlying issue is "in the amount of {$9300.00} ( due to the duplicative payment".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating which I then did. Because it was a duplicative payment to the same vendor: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
which I then did. Because it was a duplicative payment to the same vendor has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
which I then did. Because it was a duplicative payment to the same vendor has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against which I then did. Because it was a duplicative payment to the same vendor is "in the amount of {$9300.00} ( due to the duplicative payment" in the "due to a personal miscommunication" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.