Total complaints
1
Filed since XXXX
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows which happened here. The bank issued me a {$50.00} credit ( which they say was from my dispute ) that they applied to the promo balance which it wouldve reduced to {$560.00}. Instead's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since XXXX. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since XXXX
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How which happened here. The bank issued me a {$50.00} credit ( which they say was from my dispute ) that they applied to the promo balance which it wouldve reduced to {$560.00}. Instead's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| which then left the remaining owed {$610.00} ( orig owed/purchase amt was {$1800.00} ). The remaining payment went to the other outstanding balance on the card. The remaining balance was {$140.00} | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| they reduced my allocation pmt ( without my consent/knowledge ) to payoff the {$140.00} remaining running balance and then the bank increased my promo balance to {$700.00}. This is NOT okay! Per their own language Youre not required to make a payment toward the disputed amt & we wont assess any related fees/interest | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and of that {$1200.00} was directly allocated ( by me ) to the promo balance | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
which happened here. The bank issued me a {$50.00} credit ( which they say was from my dispute ) that they applied to the promo balance which it wouldve reduced to {$560.00}. Instead has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to XXXX, and the most recent logged activity is XXXX I mad, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, which happened here. The bank issued me a {$50.00} credit ( which they say was from my dispute ) that they applied to the promo balance which it wouldve reduced to {$560.00}. Instead reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "which then left the remaining owed {$610.00} ( orig owed/purchase amt was {$1800.00} ). The remaining payment went to the other outstanding balance on the card. The remaining balance was {$140.00}", and the single most common underlying issue is "and of that {$1200.00} was directly allocated ( by me ) to the promo balance".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating which happened here. The bank issued me a {$50.00} credit ( which they say was from my dispute ) that they applied to the promo balance which it wouldve reduced to {$560.00}. Instead: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
which happened here. The bank issued me a {$50.00} credit ( which they say was from my dispute ) that they applied to the promo balance which it wouldve reduced to {$560.00}. Instead has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
which happened here. The bank issued me a {$50.00} credit ( which they say was from my dispute ) that they applied to the promo balance which it wouldve reduced to {$560.00}. Instead has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against which happened here. The bank issued me a {$50.00} credit ( which they say was from my dispute ) that they applied to the promo balance which it wouldve reduced to {$560.00}. Instead is "and of that {$1200.00} was directly allocated ( by me ) to the promo balance" in the "which then left the remaining owed {$610.00} ( orig owed/purchase amt was {$1800.00} ). The remaining payment went to the other outstanding balance on the card. The remaining balance was {$140.00}" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.