Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows whereupon she responded perhaps later. XXXX XXXX did not notify XXXX XXXX that she and XXXX XXXX had previously visited the local BoA Branch located in XXXX XXXX's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since On X. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How whereupon she responded perhaps later. XXXX XXXX did not notify XXXX XXXX that she and XXXX XXXX had previously visited the local BoA Branch located in XXXX XXXX's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| which XXXX XXXX blocked. A phone call from XXXX was blocked on the XXXX | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| XXXX on XXXX XX/XX/2024. | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| explaining she did not feel well. XXXX XXXX inquired why XXXX XXXX blocked his phone calls and she explained she did not recognize the new phone number. XXXX XXXX once again inquired about closing and re-opening additional bank accounts. He continued to ask questions to get a YES answer. The conversations were on a recorded line and XXXX XXXX insisted on getting XXXX XXXX to provide a YES answer to his questions | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
whereupon she responded perhaps later. XXXX XXXX did not notify XXXX XXXX that she and XXXX XXXX had previously visited the local BoA Branch located in XXXX XXXX has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to On X, and the most recent logged activity is On XXXX XX, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, whereupon she responded perhaps later. XXXX XXXX did not notify XXXX XXXX that she and XXXX XXXX had previously visited the local BoA Branch located in XXXX XXXX reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "which XXXX XXXX blocked. A phone call from XXXX was blocked on the XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "explaining she did not feel well. XXXX XXXX inquired why XXXX XXXX blocked his phone calls and she explained she did not recognize the new phone number. XXXX XXXX once again inquired about closing and re-opening additional bank accounts. He continued to ask questions to get a YES answer. The conversations were on a recorded line and XXXX XXXX insisted on getting XXXX XXXX to provide a YES answer to his questions".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating whereupon she responded perhaps later. XXXX XXXX did not notify XXXX XXXX that she and XXXX XXXX had previously visited the local BoA Branch located in XXXX XXXX: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
whereupon she responded perhaps later. XXXX XXXX did not notify XXXX XXXX that she and XXXX XXXX had previously visited the local BoA Branch located in XXXX XXXX has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
whereupon she responded perhaps later. XXXX XXXX did not notify XXXX XXXX that she and XXXX XXXX had previously visited the local BoA Branch located in XXXX XXXX has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against whereupon she responded perhaps later. XXXX XXXX did not notify XXXX XXXX that she and XXXX XXXX had previously visited the local BoA Branch located in XXXX XXXX is "explaining she did not feel well. XXXX XXXX inquired why XXXX XXXX blocked his phone calls and she explained she did not recognize the new phone number. XXXX XXXX once again inquired about closing and re-opening additional bank accounts. He continued to ask questions to get a YES answer. The conversations were on a recorded line and XXXX XXXX insisted on getting XXXX XXXX to provide a YES answer to his questions" in the "which XXXX XXXX blocked. A phone call from XXXX was blocked on the XXXX" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.