2026 data Public-data reference. official source

when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since I di. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
I di
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since I di

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). miscellaneous fees: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% miscellaneous fees 100.0%
  • miscellaneous fees 1 100.0% 0% relief

How when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
miscellaneous fees '' without explanation. XXXX repeatedly misapplied my monthly payments to the fees despite my objections. They basically stone walled me. In XX/XX/XXXX I refused to pay until they fixed the problem. They repossessed the vehicle without any advanced notice. The police report confirms they never had provided documentation of authorization. I filed a smalls claim complaint. XXXX agreed to reverse the repossession and late and to extend the lease on month to month basis so I could find another vehicle 1

Top States

State Complaints
XXXX and XXXX claiming the charge off and repo were in XX/XX/XXXX. Only XXXX reported that it was disputed debt.,,AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP,MA,018XX,,Consent provided,Web,2017-02-06,Closed with explanation,Yes,Yes,2330446 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
so I dismissed the complaint. XXXX soon as I returned the signed lease extension 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX

when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to I di, and the most recent logged activity is I disputed, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "miscellaneous fees '' without explanation. XXXX repeatedly misapplied my monthly payments to the fees despite my objections. They basically stone walled me. In XX/XX/XXXX I refused to pay until they fixed the problem. They repossessed the vehicle without any advanced notice. The police report confirms they never had provided documentation of authorization. I filed a smalls claim complaint. XXXX agreed to reverse the repossession and late and to extend the lease on month to month basis so I could find another vehicle", and the single most common underlying issue is "so I dismissed the complaint. XXXX soon as I returned the signed lease extension".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX have?

when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX respond to complaints on time?

when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX?

The most common issue reported against when I was provided with documents showing XXXX XXXX had actually SOLD the vehicle to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX so how could they lease it to me? I discovered on XX/XX/XXXX that AHFC furnished false information to XXXX is "so I dismissed the complaint. XXXX soon as I returned the signed lease extension" in the "miscellaneous fees '' without explanation. XXXX repeatedly misapplied my monthly payments to the fees despite my objections. They basically stone walled me. In XX/XX/XXXX I refused to pay until they fixed the problem. They repossessed the vehicle without any advanced notice. The police report confirms they never had provided documentation of authorization. I filed a smalls claim complaint. XXXX agreed to reverse the repossession and late and to extend the lease on month to month basis so I could find another vehicle" product category.

Related