Total complaints
1
Filed since Defe
2026 data Public-data reference. official source
were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure.
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure.'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Defe. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
0
States Active
Defe
Since
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure. complaint mix by product
- KeyBank approved 1 100.0% – 0% relief
How were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure.'s 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Complaints by Product
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| KeyBank approved a forbearance retroactively covering XXXX months of XX/XX/XXXX through XX/XX/XXXX. XXXX servicer | 1 |
Top Issues
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| later acknowledged that the forbearance was processed on XX/XX/XXXX and brought your account current with payment due on XX/XX/XXXX. However | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
What the CFPB Record Shows About were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure.
were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure. has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Defe, and the most recent logged activity is Defective , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "KeyBank approved a forbearance retroactively covering XXXX months of XX/XX/XXXX through XX/XX/XXXX. XXXX servicer", and the single most common underlying issue is "later acknowledged that the forbearance was processed on XX/XX/XXXX and brought your account current with payment due on XX/XX/XXXX. However".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Consumer Guides
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Related Data
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
PlainBankData
Bank financial data — deposits, assets, branches, and regulatory filings for FDIC-insured institutions.
PlainAdvisorCheck
Financial advisor records — SEC and FINRA registration, disclosures, and disciplinary history.
PlainCU
Credit union data — financial performance, membership, rates, and NCUA regulatory information.
PlainInsurer
Insurance company data — financial strength, complaint ratios, market share, and state licensing.
PlainLender
Mortgage lender data — HMDA loan originations, approval rates, interest rates, and lending patterns.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CFPB complaints does were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure. have?
were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure. has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Does were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure. respond to complaints on time?
were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure. has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
What is the most common complaint about were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure.?
The most common issue reported against were not in fact due. No corrected or revised XX/XX/XXXX billing statement was ever issued to reflect the retroactive cure. is "later acknowledged that the forbearance was processed on XX/XX/XXXX and brought your account current with payment due on XX/XX/XXXX. However" in the "KeyBank approved a forbearance retroactively covering XXXX months of XX/XX/XXXX through XX/XX/XXXX. XXXX servicer" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
