2026 data Public-data reference. official source

unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes

2 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

2 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes's complaint history from CFPB public records. 2 consumers have filed complaints since i sa. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

2
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
2
States Active
i sa
Since

Total complaints

2

Filed since i sa

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 2

unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 2 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). what we: 1 complaints (50.0%), resolution 0.0% what we 50.0% what we: 1 complaints (50.0%), resolution 0.0% what we 50.0%
  • what we 1 50.0% 0% relief
  • what we 1 50.0% 0% relief

How unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes's 2 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
what we have in the recorded conversation he said .. is just scanned image copy we do not have the original note .. so the original ( the law firm of XXXX. XXXX was not in fact original but colored copy of created to show it was the original XXXX XXXX XXXX co conspiracy filing fraudulent foreclosure complaints with the courts of the State of Maryland and the County Clerks to deceive the Courts and clerks into believing they are accepting proper legal papers to obtain judgments against homeowners ) he said we do not have the original note 1
what we have in the recorded conversation he said .. is just scanned image copy we do not have the original note .. so the original ( the law firm of BWW. XXXX was not in fact original but colored copy of created to show it was the original Bww aka XXXX co conspiracy filing fraudulent foreclosure complaints with the courts of the State of XXXX and the County Clerks to deceive the Courts and clerks into believing they are accepting proper legal papers to obtain judgments against homeowners ) he said we do not have the original note 1

Top States

State Complaints
money to CO CONSPIRACY XXXX or XXXX and/or engage in litigation to defend themsleves against false filings by CO CONSPIRACY XXXX or XXXX XXXX 1
money to CO CONSPIRACY bww or XXXX and/or engage in litigation to defend themsleves against false filings by CO CONSPIRACY bww or XXXX XXXX 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
the notary does have a first name 2

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes

unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes has accumulated 2 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 2 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 2 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to i sa, and the most recent logged activity is i said why, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "what we have in the recorded conversation he said .. is just scanned image copy we do not have the original note .. so the original ( the law firm of XXXX. XXXX was not in fact original but colored copy of created to show it was the original XXXX XXXX XXXX co conspiracy filing fraudulent foreclosure complaints with the courts of the State of Maryland and the County Clerks to deceive the Courts and clerks into believing they are accepting proper legal papers to obtain judgments against homeowners ) he said we do not have the original note", and the single most common underlying issue is "the notary does have a first name".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes have?

unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes has received 2 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes respond to complaints on time?

unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes?

The most common issue reported against unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes is "the notary does have a first name" in the "what we have in the recorded conversation he said .. is just scanned image copy we do not have the original note .. so the original ( the law firm of XXXX. XXXX was not in fact original but colored copy of created to show it was the original XXXX XXXX XXXX co conspiracy filing fraudulent foreclosure complaints with the courts of the State of Maryland and the County Clerks to deceive the Courts and clerks into believing they are accepting proper legal papers to obtain judgments against homeowners ) he said we do not have the original note" product category.

Related