Total complaints
9
Filed since As a
2026 data Public-data reference. official source
unjust enrichment
9 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
9 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows unjust enrichment's complaint history from CFPB public records. 9 consumers have filed complaints since As a. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
9
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
6
States Active
As a
Since
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
unjust enrichment complaint mix by product
- I emphasize 3 33.3% – 0% relief
- and employees 2 22.2% – 0% relief
- ignores law 1 11.1% – 0% relief
- I request 1 11.1% – 0% relief
- on numerous 1 11.1% – 0% relief
- EXPERIAN 1 11.1% – 0% relief
How unjust enrichment's 9 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Complaints by Product
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I emphasize that the alleged debts | 3 |
| and employees of this agencies claimed that the amount was owed when in fact that amount is owed to me as the consumer for violations and financial injury done to me by way of identity theft | 2 |
| ignores law enforcement reports | 1 |
| I request First XXXX XXXX and CoreLogic to identify my current Creditor and how this creditor received rights to my debt ( under UCC Art 9 203 ) ; pay me compensation under Title Insurance policy | 1 |
| on numerous occasions | 1 |
| EXPERIAN | 1 |
Top States
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and misrepresentation of obligations that lack enforceable standing. | 3 |
| harm to personal and financial reputation | 2 |
| and violations of UDAP and Regulation E. | 1 |
| conspiracy to defraud | 1 |
| and violations of various state consumer protection statutes | 1 |
| breach of fiduciary duty | 1 |
Top Issues
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and related reporting provide no valuable consideration or benefit to me | 3 |
| corruption | 2 |
| an adverse inference arises that the institution is knowingly benefiting from or facilitating the fraudulent scheme. Continued retention of these funds | 1 |
| return me illegally collected money ; pay me 20 % from all trades as XXXX XXXX ; provide me a release of any liens since my mortgage is not a loan | 1 |
| XXXX | 1 |
| I will pursue legal remedies | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
What the CFPB Record Shows About unjust enrichment
unjust enrichment has accumulated 9 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 6 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 8 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to As a, and the most recent logged activity is When a fin, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, unjust enrichment reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I emphasize that the alleged debts", and the single most common underlying issue is "and related reporting provide no valuable consideration or benefit to me".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating unjust enrichment: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Consumer Guides
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Related Data
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
PlainBankData
Bank financial data — deposits, assets, branches, and regulatory filings for FDIC-insured institutions.
PlainAdvisorCheck
Financial advisor records — SEC and FINRA registration, disclosures, and disciplinary history.
PlainCU
Credit union data — financial performance, membership, rates, and NCUA regulatory information.
PlainInsurer
Insurance company data — financial strength, complaint ratios, market share, and state licensing.
PlainLender
Mortgage lender data — HMDA loan originations, approval rates, interest rates, and lending patterns.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CFPB complaints does unjust enrichment have?
unjust enrichment has received 9 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Does unjust enrichment respond to complaints on time?
unjust enrichment has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
What is the most common complaint about unjust enrichment?
The most common issue reported against unjust enrichment is "and related reporting provide no valuable consideration or benefit to me" in the "I emphasize that the alleged debts" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
