Total complaints
1
Filed since When
2026 data Public-data reference. official source
twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since When. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
When
Since
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice complaint mix by product
- XXXX 1 100.0% – 0% relief
How twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Complaints by Product
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| XXXX | 1 |
Top States
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| we would not be relaying on the largesse of XXXX XXXX to give back the money. Chase then gave me a XXXX XXXX phone number and a complaint number. I was told I should call XXXX XXXX since there was nothing Chase could do. | 1 |
Top Issues
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| if they were going to give it to me anyway | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
What the CFPB Record Shows About twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice
twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to When, and the most recent logged activity is When I met, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "if they were going to give it to me anyway".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Consumer Guides
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Related Data
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
PlainBankData
Bank financial data — deposits, assets, branches, and regulatory filings for FDIC-insured institutions.
PlainAdvisorCheck
Financial advisor records — SEC and FINRA registration, disclosures, and disciplinary history.
PlainCU
Credit union data — financial performance, membership, rates, and NCUA regulatory information.
PlainInsurer
Insurance company data — financial strength, complaint ratios, market share, and state licensing.
PlainLender
Mortgage lender data — HMDA loan originations, approval rates, interest rates, and lending patterns.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CFPB complaints does twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice have?
twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Does twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice respond to complaints on time?
twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
What is the most common complaint about twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice?
The most common issue reported against twice for the same amount and it was their computers/software that didnt even flag this as something to be looked at or rejected. I didnt understand why XXXX XXXX was the one that needed to do the right thing and return the money when it seemed to me that it was Chase that made the original error that had caused this problem. If not for Chase paying the check twice is "if they were going to give it to me anyway" in the "XXXX" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
