Total complaints
1
Filed since The
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows to my concerns. They either ignored me completely or forwarded me to another phone rep that they indicated -- probably dishonestly -- was a manager.'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since The . The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since The
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How to my concerns. They either ignored me completely or forwarded me to another phone rep that they indicated -- probably dishonestly -- was a manager.'s 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| has an OBVIOUS ERROR on the table on page XXXX of the statement. The computer or person populating the statement ERRONEOUSLY assumed ( for some obviously wrong or possibly bad faith reason ) that there would be {$0.00} of payments to the escrow account in the ( at the time future ) XX/XX/2022 and XX/XX/2022 periods. The statement therefore ERRONEOUSLY calculates a starting shortfall that needs to be made up with an additional {$150.00} / month top up escrow payment by myself over the coming year. The math is OBVIOUSLY | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| wrong but Citizens has never corrected it or generated a new escrow statement. When I made my phone calls to Citizens in XXXX and XXXX | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
to my concerns. They either ignored me completely or forwarded me to another phone rep that they indicated -- probably dishonestly -- was a manager. has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to The , and the most recent logged activity is The ESCROW, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, to my concerns. They either ignored me completely or forwarded me to another phone rep that they indicated -- probably dishonestly -- was a manager. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "has an OBVIOUS ERROR on the table on page XXXX of the statement. The computer or person populating the statement ERRONEOUSLY assumed ( for some obviously wrong or possibly bad faith reason ) that there would be {$0.00} of payments to the escrow account in the ( at the time future ) XX/XX/2022 and XX/XX/2022 periods. The statement therefore ERRONEOUSLY calculates a starting shortfall that needs to be made up with an additional {$150.00} / month top up escrow payment by myself over the coming year. The math is OBVIOUSLY", and the single most common underlying issue is "wrong but Citizens has never corrected it or generated a new escrow statement. When I made my phone calls to Citizens in XXXX and XXXX".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating to my concerns. They either ignored me completely or forwarded me to another phone rep that they indicated -- probably dishonestly -- was a manager.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
to my concerns. They either ignored me completely or forwarded me to another phone rep that they indicated -- probably dishonestly -- was a manager. has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
to my concerns. They either ignored me completely or forwarded me to another phone rep that they indicated -- probably dishonestly -- was a manager. has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against to my concerns. They either ignored me completely or forwarded me to another phone rep that they indicated -- probably dishonestly -- was a manager. is "wrong but Citizens has never corrected it or generated a new escrow statement. When I made my phone calls to Citizens in XXXX and XXXX" in the "has an OBVIOUS ERROR on the table on page XXXX of the statement. The computer or person populating the statement ERRONEOUSLY assumed ( for some obviously wrong or possibly bad faith reason ) that there would be {$0.00} of payments to the escrow account in the ( at the time future ) XX/XX/2022 and XX/XX/2022 periods. The statement therefore ERRONEOUSLY calculates a starting shortfall that needs to be made up with an additional {$150.00} / month top up escrow payment by myself over the coming year. The math is OBVIOUSLY" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.