Total complaints
1
Filed since I su
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows this meant no one over the phone or at the branch was willing to stand by the Schwab guarantee. This is terrible and unacceptable and a complete violation of my financial rights.'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since I su. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since I su
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How this meant no one over the phone or at the branch was willing to stand by the Schwab guarantee. This is terrible and unacceptable and a complete violation of my financial rights.'s 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| including a police report and confirmation of my XXXX XXXX. The police also confirmed my XXXX XXXX and stated for the record that I was defrauded. I was initially refunded by XXXX XXXX before it was soon reversed with no notification or warning. Several months later XXXX XXXX promised to refund me on three occasions before blaming not being able to do so on a committee. The latest representative from the Client Advocacy Team | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| has told me he will look into how the fraud was not detected when it was completely different to my patterns over the years ( I do not use ATMs ). Telephone banker XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
this meant no one over the phone or at the branch was willing to stand by the Schwab guarantee. This is terrible and unacceptable and a complete violation of my financial rights. has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to I su, and the most recent logged activity is I submitte, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, this meant no one over the phone or at the branch was willing to stand by the Schwab guarantee. This is terrible and unacceptable and a complete violation of my financial rights. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "including a police report and confirmation of my XXXX XXXX. The police also confirmed my XXXX XXXX and stated for the record that I was defrauded. I was initially refunded by XXXX XXXX before it was soon reversed with no notification or warning. Several months later XXXX XXXX promised to refund me on three occasions before blaming not being able to do so on a committee. The latest representative from the Client Advocacy Team", and the single most common underlying issue is "has told me he will look into how the fraud was not detected when it was completely different to my patterns over the years ( I do not use ATMs ). Telephone banker XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating this meant no one over the phone or at the branch was willing to stand by the Schwab guarantee. This is terrible and unacceptable and a complete violation of my financial rights.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
this meant no one over the phone or at the branch was willing to stand by the Schwab guarantee. This is terrible and unacceptable and a complete violation of my financial rights. has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
this meant no one over the phone or at the branch was willing to stand by the Schwab guarantee. This is terrible and unacceptable and a complete violation of my financial rights. has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against this meant no one over the phone or at the branch was willing to stand by the Schwab guarantee. This is terrible and unacceptable and a complete violation of my financial rights. is "has told me he will look into how the fraud was not detected when it was completely different to my patterns over the years ( I do not use ATMs ). Telephone banker XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX" in the "including a police report and confirmation of my XXXX XXXX. The police also confirmed my XXXX XXXX and stated for the record that I was defrauded. I was initially refunded by XXXX XXXX before it was soon reversed with no notification or warning. Several months later XXXX XXXX promised to refund me on three occasions before blaming not being able to do so on a committee. The latest representative from the Client Advocacy Team" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.