this is in violation of FHA guidelines and ( at a minimum ) the appraiser is going to get a letter from HUD. She said she wouldn't touch this assignment with a XXXX foot pole. I've asked them to reassign.

What the CFPB Record Shows About this is in violation of FHA guidelines and ( at a minimum ) the appraiser is going to get a letter from HUD. She said she wouldn't touch this assignment with a XXXX foot pole. I've asked them to reassign.

this is in violation of FHA guidelines and ( at a minimum ) the appraiser is going to get a letter from HUD. She said she wouldn't touch this assignment with a XXXX foot pole. I've asked them to reassign. has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to I re, and the most recent logged activity is I recently, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, this is in violation of FHA guidelines and ( at a minimum ) the appraiser is going to get a letter from HUD. She said she wouldn't touch this assignment with a XXXX foot pole. I've asked them to reassign. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "and noticeable sagging on the first and second floors of the house. There was nothing out of the ordinary with the report otherwise. Cardinal came back 3 TIMES and forcefully told me we require as-is reports ''. So basically Cardinal Financial is just cancelling orders immediately once they find out the appraiser is not going to rubber stamp and ignore an obvious issue. they told me to change my report from subject to inspection to as-is and remove the concern about the foundation. they didnt want a cost to cure. They wanted an as is ignoring the problem. Wasnt about me not complying with a cost to cure or finding the value of a defect situation Weve had two AMCs recent that asks us to ignore the problems too. Wonder if it has to do with packaging the loans up and MBSs and some type of quality issue? Its completely wrong. The sad part is this -- if they find an appraiser who rubber stamps this", and the single most common underlying issue is "I spoke with some of the other people at the old firm I used to work at and they confirmed that they have had issues with Cardinal in the past. One time Cardinal even asked one of their appraisers to change the effective date on a appraisal and when he refused they said we wont tattle ''. So you know what".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating this is in violation of FHA guidelines and ( at a minimum ) the appraiser is going to get a letter from HUD. She said she wouldn't touch this assignment with a XXXX foot pole. I've asked them to reassign.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.