Total complaints
2
Filed since No S
2 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
2 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows this case should be dismissed with prejudice.'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 2 consumers have filed complaints since No S. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
2
Filed since No S
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How this case should be dismissed with prejudice.'s 2 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the homeowner was not notified of transfers amid the confusion and ran the risk of losing home to a third-party superior lien. The Bank may try to use a defense for this assertion by stating that the Borrower owes $ XXXX on the taxes which would be a reasonable assertion if the loan was valid. Borrower asserts that with the aforementioned facts and knowing the original lender | 2 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| illegally transferred | 2 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
this case should be dismissed with prejudice. has accumulated 2 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 2 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to No S, and the most recent logged activity is e. No Serv, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, this case should be dismissed with prejudice. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "the homeowner was not notified of transfers amid the confusion and ran the risk of losing home to a third-party superior lien. The Bank may try to use a defense for this assertion by stating that the Borrower owes $ XXXX on the taxes which would be a reasonable assertion if the loan was valid. Borrower asserts that with the aforementioned facts and knowing the original lender", and the single most common underlying issue is "illegally transferred".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating this case should be dismissed with prejudice.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
this case should be dismissed with prejudice. has received 2 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
this case should be dismissed with prejudice. has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against this case should be dismissed with prejudice. is "illegally transferred" in the "the homeowner was not notified of transfers amid the confusion and ran the risk of losing home to a third-party superior lien. The Bank may try to use a defense for this assertion by stating that the Borrower owes $ XXXX on the taxes which would be a reasonable assertion if the loan was valid. Borrower asserts that with the aforementioned facts and knowing the original lender" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.