Total complaints
1
Filed since In f
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows this attribution is wrong and misleading- the language in the statute is very specific and narrow ; and makes it clear that a certification by the university as to the cost of attendance is not what makes a loan a qualified education loan ''. Thus's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since In f. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since In f
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How this attribution is wrong and misleading- the language in the statute is very specific and narrow ; and makes it clear that a certification by the university as to the cost of attendance is not what makes a loan a qualified education loan ''. Thus's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| when presenting this information to Navients Associate General Counsel | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Navient is not arguing or asserting that the loans were used solely for qualified education expenses which is the requirement under 11 U.S.C. 523 ( a ) ( 8 ) ( B ). | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| he did not argue against or challenge the fact that the loans were not used solely for qualified education expenses. Furthermore | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
this attribution is wrong and misleading- the language in the statute is very specific and narrow ; and makes it clear that a certification by the university as to the cost of attendance is not what makes a loan a qualified education loan ''. Thus has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to In f, and the most recent logged activity is In fact, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, this attribution is wrong and misleading- the language in the statute is very specific and narrow ; and makes it clear that a certification by the university as to the cost of attendance is not what makes a loan a qualified education loan ''. Thus reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "when presenting this information to Navients Associate General Counsel", and the single most common underlying issue is "he did not argue against or challenge the fact that the loans were not used solely for qualified education expenses. Furthermore".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating this attribution is wrong and misleading- the language in the statute is very specific and narrow ; and makes it clear that a certification by the university as to the cost of attendance is not what makes a loan a qualified education loan ''. Thus: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
this attribution is wrong and misleading- the language in the statute is very specific and narrow ; and makes it clear that a certification by the university as to the cost of attendance is not what makes a loan a qualified education loan ''. Thus has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
this attribution is wrong and misleading- the language in the statute is very specific and narrow ; and makes it clear that a certification by the university as to the cost of attendance is not what makes a loan a qualified education loan ''. Thus has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against this attribution is wrong and misleading- the language in the statute is very specific and narrow ; and makes it clear that a certification by the university as to the cost of attendance is not what makes a loan a qualified education loan ''. Thus is "he did not argue against or challenge the fact that the loans were not used solely for qualified education expenses. Furthermore" in the "when presenting this information to Navients Associate General Counsel" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.