2026 data Public-data reference. official source

they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since The . The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
The
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since The

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). me not: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% me not 100.0%
  • me not 1 100.0% 0% relief

How they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
me not accepting them is irrelevant at this point as their reps have lied saying they were not available when calling in or that there is or was a cease and desist on the account when there never was. Collection reps like to lie so they can go home and not take the call if it is before closing time of XXXX. Another rep breathed into the phone 1

Top States

State Complaints
I think this shows their unwillingness to cooperate. It appears they have referred account to some collection agency yet again 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
XXXX. Most if not all points made by Paypal rep are irrelevant/moot as you can see 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month

they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to The , and the most recent logged activity is The paymen, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "me not accepting them is irrelevant at this point as their reps have lied saying they were not available when calling in or that there is or was a cease and desist on the account when there never was. Collection reps like to lie so they can go home and not take the call if it is before closing time of XXXX. Another rep breathed into the phone", and the single most common underlying issue is "XXXX. Most if not all points made by Paypal rep are irrelevant/moot as you can see".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month have?

they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month respond to complaints on time?

they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month?

The most common issue reported against they would not have accepted at time of call so the mere mention of the call is pointless. They have denied my fraud claim but offer a settlement of XXXX but wont accept XXXX a month is "XXXX. Most if not all points made by Paypal rep are irrelevant/moot as you can see" in the "me not accepting them is irrelevant at this point as their reps have lied saying they were not available when calling in or that there is or was a cease and desist on the account when there never was. Collection reps like to lie so they can go home and not take the call if it is before closing time of XXXX. Another rep breathed into the phone" product category.

Related