they have given up their right to make a claim for the money that was allegedly loaned to me. The debt is not only unsecured but it is eradicated starting with the rescission notice and ending with their failure to comply with the statute.,Company chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,CA,94109,,Consent provided,Web,2015-11-09,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,1647430

What the CFPB Record Shows About they have given up their right to make a claim for the money that was allegedly loaned to me. The debt is not only unsecured but it is eradicated starting with the rescission notice and ending with their failure to comply with the statute.,Company chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,CA,94109,,Consent provided,Web,2015-11-09,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,1647430

they have given up their right to make a claim for the money that was allegedly loaned to me. The debt is not only unsecured but it is eradicated starting with the rescission notice and ending with their failure to comply with the statute.,Company chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,CA,94109,,Consent provided,Web,2015-11-09,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,1647430 has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to I ma, and the most recent logged activity is I mailed o, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, they have given up their right to make a claim for the money that was allegedly loaned to me. The debt is not only unsecured but it is eradicated starting with the rescission notice and ending with their failure to comply with the statute.,Company chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,CA,94109,,Consent provided,Web,2015-11-09,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,1647430 reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "2015. Wells Fargo received the notice on XXXX XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "Wells Fargo had twenty ( 20 ) calendar days from receiving the notice to either file a declaratory action against me to challenge the notice of rescission or to take the mandatory steps required under TILA. Wells Fargo did neither. The only thing Wells Fargo did was send me a letter stating they received my letter. Pursuant to TILA".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating they have given up their right to make a claim for the money that was allegedly loaned to me. The debt is not only unsecured but it is eradicated starting with the rescission notice and ending with their failure to comply with the statute.,Company chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,CA,94109,,Consent provided,Web,2015-11-09,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,1647430: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.