they did not ask for what was on the contract as far as the authorization ( which as I found out later would have shown that I wasnt given a specified way to revoke authorization which made the original authorization I had signed null and void by law anyway ). I did tell them that according to my contract with the entity I had revoked authorization verbally.

What the CFPB Record Shows About they did not ask for what was on the contract as far as the authorization ( which as I found out later would have shown that I wasnt given a specified way to revoke authorization which made the original authorization I had signed null and void by law anyway ). I did tell them that according to my contract with the entity I had revoked authorization verbally.

they did not ask for what was on the contract as far as the authorization ( which as I found out later would have shown that I wasnt given a specified way to revoke authorization which made the original authorization I had signed null and void by law anyway ). I did tell them that according to my contract with the entity I had revoked authorization verbally. has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to I th, and the most recent logged activity is I then ask, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, they did not ask for what was on the contract as far as the authorization ( which as I found out later would have shown that I wasnt given a specified way to revoke authorization which made the original authorization I had signed null and void by law anyway ). I did tell them that according to my contract with the entity I had revoked authorization verbally. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "the lack of authorization and refused to close my account to switch it or give me any option whatsoever to keep this unauthorized entity from accessing my account. After many phone calls and complaints and because she was literally yelling at me", and the single most common underlying issue is "consisted of asking me if I owed the company".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating they did not ask for what was on the contract as far as the authorization ( which as I found out later would have shown that I wasnt given a specified way to revoke authorization which made the original authorization I had signed null and void by law anyway ). I did tell them that according to my contract with the entity I had revoked authorization verbally.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.