they decided I was not eligible to receive any type of victim protection reimbursement because I had admitted that I still had the card in my possession ( true ) but the merchant ( AKA the square reader merchant who is actually the thief ) used my card 's XXXX chip. They then threatened that if I did not pay this {$7600.00} they would be reporting me to the credit bureau!

What the CFPB Record Shows About they decided I was not eligible to receive any type of victim protection reimbursement because I had admitted that I still had the card in my possession ( true ) but the merchant ( AKA the square reader merchant who is actually the thief ) used my card 's XXXX chip. They then threatened that if I did not pay this {$7600.00} they would be reporting me to the credit bureau!

they decided I was not eligible to receive any type of victim protection reimbursement because I had admitted that I still had the card in my possession ( true ) but the merchant ( AKA the square reader merchant who is actually the thief ) used my card 's XXXX chip. They then threatened that if I did not pay this {$7600.00} they would be reporting me to the credit bureau! has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Upon, and the most recent logged activity is Upon the r, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, they decided I was not eligible to receive any type of victim protection reimbursement because I had admitted that I still had the card in my possession ( true ) but the merchant ( AKA the square reader merchant who is actually the thief ) used my card 's XXXX chip. They then threatened that if I did not pay this {$7600.00} they would be reporting me to the credit bureau! reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I immediately notified my credit card bank", and the single most common underlying issue is "to report the fraudulent purchases. They have a tedious process of asking you repeatedly the same questions over and over ( like your birthday".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating they decided I was not eligible to receive any type of victim protection reimbursement because I had admitted that I still had the card in my possession ( true ) but the merchant ( AKA the square reader merchant who is actually the thief ) used my card 's XXXX chip. They then threatened that if I did not pay this {$7600.00} they would be reporting me to the credit bureau!: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.