they charged an ADDITIONAL {$35.00}. I called the bank and had a very pleasant young lady who reversed the {$70.00} charge and also told me that she agrees with me that it is terrible business to allow a check to clear two days prior to the date that was on the check. I have had checks from government agencies and no bank will cash that check till the date on said check. But

What the CFPB Record Shows About they charged an ADDITIONAL {$35.00}. I called the bank and had a very pleasant young lady who reversed the {$70.00} charge and also told me that she agrees with me that it is terrible business to allow a check to clear two days prior to the date that was on the check. I have had checks from government agencies and no bank will cash that check till the date on said check. But

they charged an ADDITIONAL {$35.00}. I called the bank and had a very pleasant young lady who reversed the {$70.00} charge and also told me that she agrees with me that it is terrible business to allow a check to clear two days prior to the date that was on the check. I have had checks from government agencies and no bank will cash that check till the date on said check. But has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 0 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Toda, and the most recent logged activity is Today, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, they charged an ADDITIONAL {$35.00}. I called the bank and had a very pleasant young lady who reversed the {$70.00} charge and also told me that she agrees with me that it is terrible business to allow a check to clear two days prior to the date that was on the check. I have had checks from government agencies and no bank will cash that check till the date on said check. But reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "XXXX XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "I looked at my bank balance and there was an additional {$70.00} that had been taken out of my account. {$35.00} for the account being over drawn ( I do n't get paid till Friday XXXX".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating they charged an ADDITIONAL {$35.00}. I called the bank and had a very pleasant young lady who reversed the {$70.00} charge and also told me that she agrees with me that it is terrible business to allow a check to clear two days prior to the date that was on the check. I have had checks from government agencies and no bank will cash that check till the date on said check. But: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.