2026 data Public-data reference. official source

there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since In a. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
In a
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since In a

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). Webster Bank: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% Webster Bank 100.0%
  • Webster Bank 1 100.0% 0% relief

How there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
Webster Bank notified me that my escrow account was short by {$9600.00}. Not only would I not get the promised projected escrow rebate of {$1.00} 1

Top States

State Complaints
not a bill for {$9600.00} spread out monthly in XXXX. Webster 's Regional manager promised me that the bank would rectify this '' and would get back to me in writing. Although weeks have passed 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
but Webster was billing me every month in XXXX {$6.00} 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund

there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to In a, and the most recent logged activity is In a lette, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "Webster Bank notified me that my escrow account was short by {$9600.00}. Not only would I not get the promised projected escrow rebate of {$1.00}", and the single most common underlying issue is "but Webster was billing me every month in XXXX {$6.00}".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund have?

there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund respond to complaints on time?

there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund?

The most common issue reported against there has been no valid explanation for the 31 % increase. I relied on Webster 's billing of {$4800.00} each month in XXXX as well as its projected escrow analysis indicating that I would be entitled to a {$1300.00} refund is "but Webster was billing me every month in XXXX {$6.00}" in the "Webster Bank notified me that my escrow account was short by {$9600.00}. Not only would I not get the promised projected escrow rebate of {$1.00}" product category.

Related