Total complaints
2
Filed since it i
2 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
2 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows then as a consumer the credit reporting companies's complaint history from CFPB public records. 2 consumers have filed complaints since it i. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
2
Filed since it i
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How then as a consumer the credit reporting companies's 2 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the {$5.00} leftover payment ( that I was told the wrong amount by XXXX XXXX ) reduced my perfectly great credit score of XXXX down to XXXX. That is nearly XXXX point drop in credit because of a {$5.00} mistake that was not my fault. I was told regardless of how much the payment missed was | 1 |
| the {$5.00} leftover payment ( that I was told the wrong amount by XXXX XXXX ) reduced my perfectly great credit score of XXXX down to XXXX. That is nearly XXXX point drop in credit because of a {$5.00} mistake that was not my fault. I was told regardless of how much the payment missed was | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| such as XXXX and Transunion | 1 |
| such as Experian and XXXX | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| that makes no sense at all. A missed payment of {$10000.00} should have a dramatically different effect than a {$1.00} missed payment. The entire presmise and principal on credit reporting is so companies can qualify consumers to extend credit or terms too. A consumer who misses a {$1.00} payment vs a consumer who misses a {$10000.00} payment should certainly be viewed as more credit worthy. But that isnt the case under the current circumstances. And if that isnt the case then the entire existance and purpose of credit reports and determining one 's credit worthiness is broken. For example | 2 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
then as a consumer the credit reporting companies has accumulated 2 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 2 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 2 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to it i, and the most recent logged activity is it is unet, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, then as a consumer the credit reporting companies reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "the {$5.00} leftover payment ( that I was told the wrong amount by XXXX XXXX ) reduced my perfectly great credit score of XXXX down to XXXX. That is nearly XXXX point drop in credit because of a {$5.00} mistake that was not my fault. I was told regardless of how much the payment missed was", and the single most common underlying issue is "that makes no sense at all. A missed payment of {$10000.00} should have a dramatically different effect than a {$1.00} missed payment. The entire presmise and principal on credit reporting is so companies can qualify consumers to extend credit or terms too. A consumer who misses a {$1.00} payment vs a consumer who misses a {$10000.00} payment should certainly be viewed as more credit worthy. But that isnt the case under the current circumstances. And if that isnt the case then the entire existance and purpose of credit reports and determining one 's credit worthiness is broken. For example".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating then as a consumer the credit reporting companies: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
then as a consumer the credit reporting companies has received 2 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
then as a consumer the credit reporting companies has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against then as a consumer the credit reporting companies is "that makes no sense at all. A missed payment of {$10000.00} should have a dramatically different effect than a {$1.00} missed payment. The entire presmise and principal on credit reporting is so companies can qualify consumers to extend credit or terms too. A consumer who misses a {$1.00} payment vs a consumer who misses a {$10000.00} payment should certainly be viewed as more credit worthy. But that isnt the case under the current circumstances. And if that isnt the case then the entire existance and purpose of credit reports and determining one 's credit worthiness is broken. For example" in the "the {$5.00} leftover payment ( that I was told the wrong amount by XXXX XXXX ) reduced my perfectly great credit score of XXXX down to XXXX. That is nearly XXXX point drop in credit because of a {$5.00} mistake that was not my fault. I was told regardless of how much the payment missed was" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.