Total complaints
2
Filed since For
2026 data Public-data reference. official source
The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent
2 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
2 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent's complaint history from CFPB public records. 2 consumers have filed complaints since For . The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
2
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
2
States Active
For
Since
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent complaint mix by product
- hundreds of 1 50.0% – 0% relief
- hundreds of 1 50.0% – 0% relief
How The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent's 2 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Complaints by Product
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| hundreds of thousands of hopeful students borrowed billions to attend The XXXX XXXX and got little but lies in return. Based on the evidence | 1 |
| hundreds of thousands of hopeful students borrowed billions to attend XXXX XXXX XXXX and got little but lies in return. Based on the evidence | 1 |
Top States
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| XXXX percentage points lower than advertised. The true average in-field employment rate was lower than XXXX percent because the school also falsified some internal data to make graduates appear to be working in-field when they were not. | 1 |
| XXXX percentage points lower than advertised. The true average in-field employment rate was lower than XXXX percent because the school also falsified some internal data to make graduates appear to be working in-field when they were not. The advertisements promoting The XXXX Institutes ' falsified employment rates also displayed inaccurate average salaries that graduates earned from their in-field positions based on the same flawed data as the employment rates. Testimony from former high-raking school officials supported the findings that school personnel made up graduate earnings and annualized the actual or estimated incomes of graduates working in temporary positions. They also included high-earning outliers in its averages and falsified incomes reported for graduates. | 1 |
Top Issues
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| but the school 's own records demonstrate that it inflated advertised employment rates. For example | 2 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
What the CFPB Record Shows About The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent
The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent has accumulated 2 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 2 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 2 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to For , and the most recent logged activity is MY FEDERAL, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "hundreds of thousands of hopeful students borrowed billions to attend The XXXX XXXX and got little but lies in return. Based on the evidence", and the single most common underlying issue is "but the school 's own records demonstrate that it inflated advertised employment rates. For example".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Consumer Guides
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Related Data
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
PlainBankData
Bank financial data — deposits, assets, branches, and regulatory filings for FDIC-insured institutions.
PlainAdvisorCheck
Financial advisor records — SEC and FINRA registration, disclosures, and disciplinary history.
PlainCU
Credit union data — financial performance, membership, rates, and NCUA regulatory information.
PlainInsurer
Insurance company data — financial strength, complaint ratios, market share, and state licensing.
PlainLender
Mortgage lender data — HMDA loan originations, approval rates, interest rates, and lending patterns.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CFPB complaints does The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent have?
The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent has received 2 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Does The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent respond to complaints on time?
The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
What is the most common complaint about The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent?
The most common issue reported against The XXXX XXXX ' average in-field employment rate dropped from XXXX percent to no higher than XXXX percent is "but the school 's own records demonstrate that it inflated advertised employment rates. For example" in the "hundreds of thousands of hopeful students borrowed billions to attend The XXXX XXXX and got little but lies in return. Based on the evidence" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
