Total complaints
1
Filed since Afte
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows the original valve cover could have been leaking around the seal and it is possible to have gotten oil into that sensor. XXXX Monday XX/XX/XXXX's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Afte. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Afte
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How the original valve cover could have been leaking around the seal and it is possible to have gotten oil into that sensor. XXXX Monday XX/XX/XXXX's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I identified several discrepancies with the merchants claims that were not considered during the investigation : The merchant provided you with fraudulent documents marked as 1 and 2 ( RO # XXXX XXXX in which I made Claims Supervisor XXXX aware of this on XX/XX/XXXX. The merchant deceptively created a repair order diagnostic and written estimate after the date of service without my knowledge ; as I did not either of the presented documents. Additionally | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Paragraph ) The merchants admission explains how his service were not performed properly and aligned to documents I faxed to BOA : XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX : XXXX Technician Removed connection at eccentric shaft sensor and found that sensor full of oil. As indicated in the diagnostic notes | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| 000 miles warranty on the part whichever occurs first and indicated the warranty does not cover labor cost for removal | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
the original valve cover could have been leaking around the seal and it is possible to have gotten oil into that sensor. XXXX Monday XX/XX/XXXX has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Afte, and the most recent logged activity is After revi, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, the original valve cover could have been leaking around the seal and it is possible to have gotten oil into that sensor. XXXX Monday XX/XX/XXXX reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I identified several discrepancies with the merchants claims that were not considered during the investigation : The merchant provided you with fraudulent documents marked as 1 and 2 ( RO # XXXX XXXX in which I made Claims Supervisor XXXX aware of this on XX/XX/XXXX. The merchant deceptively created a repair order diagnostic and written estimate after the date of service without my knowledge ; as I did not either of the presented documents. Additionally", and the single most common underlying issue is "000 miles warranty on the part whichever occurs first and indicated the warranty does not cover labor cost for removal".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating the original valve cover could have been leaking around the seal and it is possible to have gotten oil into that sensor. XXXX Monday XX/XX/XXXX: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
the original valve cover could have been leaking around the seal and it is possible to have gotten oil into that sensor. XXXX Monday XX/XX/XXXX has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
the original valve cover could have been leaking around the seal and it is possible to have gotten oil into that sensor. XXXX Monday XX/XX/XXXX has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against the original valve cover could have been leaking around the seal and it is possible to have gotten oil into that sensor. XXXX Monday XX/XX/XXXX is "000 miles warranty on the part whichever occurs first and indicated the warranty does not cover labor cost for removal" in the "I identified several discrepancies with the merchants claims that were not considered during the investigation : The merchant provided you with fraudulent documents marked as 1 and 2 ( RO # XXXX XXXX in which I made Claims Supervisor XXXX aware of this on XX/XX/XXXX. The merchant deceptively created a repair order diagnostic and written estimate after the date of service without my knowledge ; as I did not either of the presented documents. Additionally" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.