Total complaints
1
Filed since Even
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows the extension documents were never sent.'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Even. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Even
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How the extension documents were never sent.'s 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| he still received calls later that day from collectors at NMAC to make a payment. Being that a payment should not have been due until XX/XX/XXXX | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| XXXX stated that the company can not process an extension/deferment for two consecutive months. This was not explained to me on the call on XX/XX/XXXX when the representative of NMAC asked me if I would like to defer two months when I only asked to defer one initially. He then stated that I would have to complete documents for a regular '' deferment since I have gone back to work. The deferment I received back in XXXX was a FEMA deferment ''. I asked if it could not be processed since I was out of work at the time of the request. He said no. I also requested to have the XXXX payment deferred as agreed on XX/XX/XXXX | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
the extension documents were never sent. has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Even, and the most recent logged activity is Even after, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, the extension documents were never sent. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "he still received calls later that day from collectors at NMAC to make a payment. Being that a payment should not have been due until XX/XX/XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "XXXX stated that the company can not process an extension/deferment for two consecutive months. This was not explained to me on the call on XX/XX/XXXX when the representative of NMAC asked me if I would like to defer two months when I only asked to defer one initially. He then stated that I would have to complete documents for a regular '' deferment since I have gone back to work. The deferment I received back in XXXX was a FEMA deferment ''. I asked if it could not be processed since I was out of work at the time of the request. He said no. I also requested to have the XXXX payment deferred as agreed on XX/XX/XXXX".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating the extension documents were never sent.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
the extension documents were never sent. has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
the extension documents were never sent. has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against the extension documents were never sent. is "XXXX stated that the company can not process an extension/deferment for two consecutive months. This was not explained to me on the call on XX/XX/XXXX when the representative of NMAC asked me if I would like to defer two months when I only asked to defer one initially. He then stated that I would have to complete documents for a regular '' deferment since I have gone back to work. The deferment I received back in XXXX was a FEMA deferment ''. I asked if it could not be processed since I was out of work at the time of the request. He said no. I also requested to have the XXXX payment deferred as agreed on XX/XX/XXXX" in the "he still received calls later that day from collectors at NMAC to make a payment. Being that a payment should not have been due until XX/XX/XXXX" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.