Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows the Buyers already revealed in the contract that they had $ XXXX in the bank that would enable them to get a mortgage. The denial reason was inconsistent with this fact's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since On X. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How the Buyers already revealed in the contract that they had $ XXXX in the bank that would enable them to get a mortgage. The denial reason was inconsistent with this fact's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| she submitted a letter from NFM Lending as evidence | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| since NFM was giving them 95 % LTV on a $ XXXX note. | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the letter was informal & suspicious. I asked our agent to request the official Adverse Action Notice which per XXXX requires NFM to identify specific denial reasons. Our agent reached out to NFM Lending and requested the Adv. Act. Notice from the underwriter. The NFM rep. indicated [ that the buyers ] were nowhere near a denial ''. Due to a lack of agreement on a new sales price we received | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
the Buyers already revealed in the contract that they had $ XXXX in the bank that would enable them to get a mortgage. The denial reason was inconsistent with this fact has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to On X, and the most recent logged activity is On XXXX/XX, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, the Buyers already revealed in the contract that they had $ XXXX in the bank that would enable them to get a mortgage. The denial reason was inconsistent with this fact reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "she submitted a letter from NFM Lending as evidence", and the single most common underlying issue is "the letter was informal & suspicious. I asked our agent to request the official Adverse Action Notice which per XXXX requires NFM to identify specific denial reasons. Our agent reached out to NFM Lending and requested the Adv. Act. Notice from the underwriter. The NFM rep. indicated [ that the buyers ] were nowhere near a denial ''. Due to a lack of agreement on a new sales price we received".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating the Buyers already revealed in the contract that they had $ XXXX in the bank that would enable them to get a mortgage. The denial reason was inconsistent with this fact: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
the Buyers already revealed in the contract that they had $ XXXX in the bank that would enable them to get a mortgage. The denial reason was inconsistent with this fact has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
the Buyers already revealed in the contract that they had $ XXXX in the bank that would enable them to get a mortgage. The denial reason was inconsistent with this fact has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against the Buyers already revealed in the contract that they had $ XXXX in the bank that would enable them to get a mortgage. The denial reason was inconsistent with this fact is "the letter was informal & suspicious. I asked our agent to request the official Adverse Action Notice which per XXXX requires NFM to identify specific denial reasons. Our agent reached out to NFM Lending and requested the Adv. Act. Notice from the underwriter. The NFM rep. indicated [ that the buyers ] were nowhere near a denial ''. Due to a lack of agreement on a new sales price we received" in the "she submitted a letter from NFM Lending as evidence" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.