Total complaints
1
Filed since Desp
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows the banks failed in their duty to apply reasonable monitoring's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Desp. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Desp
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How the banks failed in their duty to apply reasonable monitoring's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| both XXXX XXXX and Wells Fargo Bank have failed to provide any meaningful response. To date : I have not received a final determination on my fraud claims I have not been provided with written findings or investigative conclusions I have not been informed whether recalls were attempted in a timely manner I have not been informed whether internal transaction monitoring alerts were triggered I have not been given any explanation as to why international wires of this size | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| escalation | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and destination were permitted without enhanced scrutiny The pattern of transactions should have raised immediate red flags. The transfers were unusually large | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
the banks failed in their duty to apply reasonable monitoring has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Desp, and the most recent logged activity is Despite th, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, the banks failed in their duty to apply reasonable monitoring reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "both XXXX XXXX and Wells Fargo Bank have failed to provide any meaningful response. To date : I have not received a final determination on my fraud claims I have not been provided with written findings or investigative conclusions I have not been informed whether recalls were attempted in a timely manner I have not been informed whether internal transaction monitoring alerts were triggered I have not been given any explanation as to why international wires of this size", and the single most common underlying issue is "and destination were permitted without enhanced scrutiny The pattern of transactions should have raised immediate red flags. The transfers were unusually large".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating the banks failed in their duty to apply reasonable monitoring: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
the banks failed in their duty to apply reasonable monitoring has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
the banks failed in their duty to apply reasonable monitoring has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against the banks failed in their duty to apply reasonable monitoring is "and destination were permitted without enhanced scrutiny The pattern of transactions should have raised immediate red flags. The transfers were unusually large" in the "both XXXX XXXX and Wells Fargo Bank have failed to provide any meaningful response. To date : I have not received a final determination on my fraud claims I have not been provided with written findings or investigative conclusions I have not been informed whether recalls were attempted in a timely manner I have not been informed whether internal transaction monitoring alerts were triggered I have not been given any explanation as to why international wires of this size" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.