Total complaints
1
Filed since XX/X
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows the banker changed his mind and decided that none of my deposits or pay stubs qualified yet refused to elaborate as to why. I also inquired as to why I was asked to provide pay stubs for verification if the transactions were never eligible. XXXX responded by saying something to the effect of because they were trying to do everything for me that they could which is a lie. If something does not qualify's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since XX/X. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since XX/X
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How the banker changed his mind and decided that none of my deposits or pay stubs qualified yet refused to elaborate as to why. I also inquired as to why I was asked to provide pay stubs for verification if the transactions were never eligible. XXXX responded by saying something to the effect of because they were trying to do everything for me that they could which is a lie. If something does not qualify's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I received nothing more than a constant repeat of those are transfers and they were never eligible. XXXX repeatedly contradicted himself and refused to provide any clarification on which specific item in the Terms and Conditions was not met. I was told at one point that the paystubs I provided ( as previously requested ) did not specifically state the deposit was made to First Tech | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| then it does not qualify. How can something thats deemed as never eligible require further verification | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and that I did not use their Direct Deposit form and for these reasons I was not eligible for the bonus. When I asked where I could find this information in the T & C | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
the banker changed his mind and decided that none of my deposits or pay stubs qualified yet refused to elaborate as to why. I also inquired as to why I was asked to provide pay stubs for verification if the transactions were never eligible. XXXX responded by saying something to the effect of because they were trying to do everything for me that they could which is a lie. If something does not qualify has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to XX/X, and the most recent logged activity is XX/XX/XXXX, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, the banker changed his mind and decided that none of my deposits or pay stubs qualified yet refused to elaborate as to why. I also inquired as to why I was asked to provide pay stubs for verification if the transactions were never eligible. XXXX responded by saying something to the effect of because they were trying to do everything for me that they could which is a lie. If something does not qualify reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I received nothing more than a constant repeat of those are transfers and they were never eligible. XXXX repeatedly contradicted himself and refused to provide any clarification on which specific item in the Terms and Conditions was not met. I was told at one point that the paystubs I provided ( as previously requested ) did not specifically state the deposit was made to First Tech", and the single most common underlying issue is "and that I did not use their Direct Deposit form and for these reasons I was not eligible for the bonus. When I asked where I could find this information in the T & C".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating the banker changed his mind and decided that none of my deposits or pay stubs qualified yet refused to elaborate as to why. I also inquired as to why I was asked to provide pay stubs for verification if the transactions were never eligible. XXXX responded by saying something to the effect of because they were trying to do everything for me that they could which is a lie. If something does not qualify: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
the banker changed his mind and decided that none of my deposits or pay stubs qualified yet refused to elaborate as to why. I also inquired as to why I was asked to provide pay stubs for verification if the transactions were never eligible. XXXX responded by saying something to the effect of because they were trying to do everything for me that they could which is a lie. If something does not qualify has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
the banker changed his mind and decided that none of my deposits or pay stubs qualified yet refused to elaborate as to why. I also inquired as to why I was asked to provide pay stubs for verification if the transactions were never eligible. XXXX responded by saying something to the effect of because they were trying to do everything for me that they could which is a lie. If something does not qualify has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against the banker changed his mind and decided that none of my deposits or pay stubs qualified yet refused to elaborate as to why. I also inquired as to why I was asked to provide pay stubs for verification if the transactions were never eligible. XXXX responded by saying something to the effect of because they were trying to do everything for me that they could which is a lie. If something does not qualify is "and that I did not use their Direct Deposit form and for these reasons I was not eligible for the bonus. When I asked where I could find this information in the T & C" in the "I received nothing more than a constant repeat of those are transfers and they were never eligible. XXXX repeatedly contradicted himself and refused to provide any clarification on which specific item in the Terms and Conditions was not met. I was told at one point that the paystubs I provided ( as previously requested ) did not specifically state the deposit was made to First Tech" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.