2026 data Public-data reference. official source

that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since It i. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
It i
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since It i

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). or they: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% or they 100.0%
  • or they 1 100.0% 0% relief

How that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
or they just dont care 1

Top States

State Complaints
why was XXXX claiming that our bags and our check in were not connected? Is that regular practice that they check bags to a destination without a passenger? 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
I felt threatened when the XXXX agent in XXXX advised 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise

that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to It i, and the most recent logged activity is It is uncl, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "or they just dont care", and the single most common underlying issue is "I felt threatened when the XXXX agent in XXXX advised".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise have?

that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise respond to complaints on time?

that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise?

The most common issue reported against that my wife and I would have to spend the night in XXXX XXXX due to a technical error that XXXX made was a significant scare tactic. She had not asked us about how we had bags on the flight and that we were not checked in for it. She had threatened us over something she had not gathered facts on. Security wise is "I felt threatened when the XXXX agent in XXXX advised" in the "or they just dont care" product category.

Related