Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows that did not take away from the fact that I never agreed to the purchase nor did I authorize it. She said I could have the case reopened's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since On X. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How that did not take away from the fact that I never agreed to the purchase nor did I authorize it. She said I could have the case reopened's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| 2016 a charge of XXXX was posted to my account that I never authorized. I called Barclays on XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| but she can not do it over the phone ( all of this if your calls are recorded can be verified ). That i would need to send a message to have this reopened. She also suggest I contact the Purchase Protection team and try to use that benefit where companies do not accept returns. I called the purchase protection team and they denied the claim saying that wine is not covered under purchase protection. | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and the reason was suppose to be attached. However the printouts given to me were completely illegible. I have taken a picture and attached it. If you can read the printout | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
that did not take away from the fact that I never agreed to the purchase nor did I authorize it. She said I could have the case reopened has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to On X, and the most recent logged activity is On XXXX XX, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, that did not take away from the fact that I never agreed to the purchase nor did I authorize it. She said I could have the case reopened reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "2016 a charge of XXXX was posted to my account that I never authorized. I called Barclays on XXXX XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "and the reason was suppose to be attached. However the printouts given to me were completely illegible. I have taken a picture and attached it. If you can read the printout".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating that did not take away from the fact that I never agreed to the purchase nor did I authorize it. She said I could have the case reopened: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
that did not take away from the fact that I never agreed to the purchase nor did I authorize it. She said I could have the case reopened has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
that did not take away from the fact that I never agreed to the purchase nor did I authorize it. She said I could have the case reopened has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against that did not take away from the fact that I never agreed to the purchase nor did I authorize it. She said I could have the case reopened is "and the reason was suppose to be attached. However the printouts given to me were completely illegible. I have taken a picture and attached it. If you can read the printout" in the "2016 a charge of XXXX was posted to my account that I never authorized. I called Barclays on XXXX XXXX" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.