Total complaints
1
Filed since USAA
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows Texas on the day of the fraudulent transaction ( and I left for my local BART station much earlier's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since USAA. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since USAA
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How Texas on the day of the fraudulent transaction ( and I left for my local BART station much earlier's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| which I discuss in more detail below : * Their belief that the transaction was not fraud is predicated on it being an EMV chip-present '' transaction -- these are now prone to fraud just like magnetic swipe transactions * I provided ample evidence to USAA that I was not in XXXX XXXX at the time the fraud occurred A chip-present '' or EMV transaction is not evidence that the authentic card was present. As USAA may already know | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| arriving at the airport around XXXX ) * A used XXXX XXXX ticket with confirmation number for the above-mentioned flight,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION,CA,94110,,Consent provided,Web,2020-02-01,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,3516645 | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| as described in this article : XXXX XXXX XXXX Furthermore | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
Texas on the day of the fraudulent transaction ( and I left for my local BART station much earlier has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to USAA, and the most recent logged activity is USAA 's in, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, Texas on the day of the fraudulent transaction ( and I left for my local BART station much earlier reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "which I discuss in more detail below : * Their belief that the transaction was not fraud is predicated on it being an EMV chip-present '' transaction -- these are now prone to fraud just like magnetic swipe transactions * I provided ample evidence to USAA that I was not in XXXX XXXX at the time the fraud occurred A chip-present '' or EMV transaction is not evidence that the authentic card was present. As USAA may already know", and the single most common underlying issue is "as described in this article : XXXX XXXX XXXX Furthermore".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating Texas on the day of the fraudulent transaction ( and I left for my local BART station much earlier: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Texas on the day of the fraudulent transaction ( and I left for my local BART station much earlier has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Texas on the day of the fraudulent transaction ( and I left for my local BART station much earlier has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against Texas on the day of the fraudulent transaction ( and I left for my local BART station much earlier is "as described in this article : XXXX XXXX XXXX Furthermore" in the "which I discuss in more detail below : * Their belief that the transaction was not fraud is predicated on it being an EMV chip-present '' transaction -- these are now prone to fraud just like magnetic swipe transactions * I provided ample evidence to USAA that I was not in XXXX XXXX at the time the fraud occurred A chip-present '' or EMV transaction is not evidence that the authentic card was present. As USAA may already know" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.