terms would be similar to my last loan. I think we had to make two trips back to TitleMax to complete all the paperwork and pick up the check! HOWEVER! LATER ON I WAS LEAD TO BELIEVE THAT I NEEDED TO SIGN AN ADDITIONAL FORM ONLINE! I DID THAT! WHAT I DID NOT REALIZE WAS THE TERMS WERE NOT THE SAME AS THE LOAN IN XXXX!!! EVEN THOUGH THE AGENT WHO WAS WORKING WITH ME ASSURED ME THEY WOULD BE!!!

What the CFPB Record Shows About terms would be similar to my last loan. I think we had to make two trips back to TitleMax to complete all the paperwork and pick up the check! HOWEVER! LATER ON I WAS LEAD TO BELIEVE THAT I NEEDED TO SIGN AN ADDITIONAL FORM ONLINE! I DID THAT! WHAT I DID NOT REALIZE WAS THE TERMS WERE NOT THE SAME AS THE LOAN IN XXXX!!! EVEN THOUGH THE AGENT WHO WAS WORKING WITH ME ASSURED ME THEY WOULD BE!!!

terms would be similar to my last loan. I think we had to make two trips back to TitleMax to complete all the paperwork and pick up the check! HOWEVER! LATER ON I WAS LEAD TO BELIEVE THAT I NEEDED TO SIGN AN ADDITIONAL FORM ONLINE! I DID THAT! WHAT I DID NOT REALIZE WAS THE TERMS WERE NOT THE SAME AS THE LOAN IN XXXX!!! EVEN THOUGH THE AGENT WHO WAS WORKING WITH ME ASSURED ME THEY WOULD BE!!! has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to I ph, and the most recent logged activity is I phoned t, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, terms would be similar to my last loan. I think we had to make two trips back to TitleMax to complete all the paperwork and pick up the check! HOWEVER! LATER ON I WAS LEAD TO BELIEVE THAT I NEEDED TO SIGN AN ADDITIONAL FORM ONLINE! I DID THAT! WHAT I DID NOT REALIZE WAS THE TERMS WERE NOT THE SAME AS THE LOAN IN XXXX!!! EVEN THOUGH THE AGENT WHO WAS WORKING WITH ME ASSURED ME THEY WOULD BE!!! reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "which turned out to be located across the state line in XXXX XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "everything SEEMED to go fairly smoothly! I explained several times that I successfully borrowed from their company while living in XXXX AND that I WANTED THE SAME TYPE OF LOAN".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating terms would be similar to my last loan. I think we had to make two trips back to TitleMax to complete all the paperwork and pick up the check! HOWEVER! LATER ON I WAS LEAD TO BELIEVE THAT I NEEDED TO SIGN AN ADDITIONAL FORM ONLINE! I DID THAT! WHAT I DID NOT REALIZE WAS THE TERMS WERE NOT THE SAME AS THE LOAN IN XXXX!!! EVEN THOUGH THE AGENT WHO WAS WORKING WITH ME ASSURED ME THEY WOULD BE!!!: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.