2026 data Public-data reference. official source

stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Afte. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
Afte
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since Afte

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). the Bank: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% the Bank 100.0%
  • the Bank 1 100.0% 0% relief

How stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
the Bank began its fraud claim dispute process and claimed to investigate this matter. The cardholders also reported the fraud charges to their local police. In addition 1

Top States

State Complaints
'' even though a Bank representative advised the cardholder that the Bank approved the charges and assisted a fraudster impersonator on XX/XX/XXXX. Each time the cardholders demanded that the Bank reopen its investigation. 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
the cardholders told the Bank Representatives that they were gathering evidence to assist in the investigation and that they needed the Bank to contact the merchant to reverse or attain the identity of the airline ticket holders in order to assist the police in their investigation. Although being assured by Bank 's Customer Service representatives that their fraud investigators would contact the police and take 90 days to research the matter 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device

stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Afte, and the most recent logged activity is After the , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "the Bank began its fraud claim dispute process and claimed to investigate this matter. The cardholders also reported the fraud charges to their local police. In addition", and the single most common underlying issue is "the cardholders told the Bank Representatives that they were gathering evidence to assist in the investigation and that they needed the Bank to contact the merchant to reverse or attain the identity of the airline ticket holders in order to assist the police in their investigation. Although being assured by Bank 's Customer Service representatives that their fraud investigators would contact the police and take 90 days to research the matter".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device have?

stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device respond to complaints on time?

stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device?

The most common issue reported against stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device is "the cardholders told the Bank Representatives that they were gathering evidence to assist in the investigation and that they needed the Bank to contact the merchant to reverse or attain the identity of the airline ticket holders in order to assist the police in their investigation. Although being assured by Bank 's Customer Service representatives that their fraud investigators would contact the police and take 90 days to research the matter" in the "the Bank began its fraud claim dispute process and claimed to investigate this matter. The cardholders also reported the fraud charges to their local police. In addition" product category.

Related