Total complaints
1
Filed since Afte
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Afte. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Afte
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the Bank began its fraud claim dispute process and claimed to investigate this matter. The cardholders also reported the fraud charges to their local police. In addition | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| '' even though a Bank representative advised the cardholder that the Bank approved the charges and assisted a fraudster impersonator on XX/XX/XXXX. Each time the cardholders demanded that the Bank reopen its investigation. | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the cardholders told the Bank Representatives that they were gathering evidence to assist in the investigation and that they needed the Bank to contact the merchant to reverse or attain the identity of the airline ticket holders in order to assist the police in their investigation. Although being assured by Bank 's Customer Service representatives that their fraud investigators would contact the police and take 90 days to research the matter | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Afte, and the most recent logged activity is After the , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "the Bank began its fraud claim dispute process and claimed to investigate this matter. The cardholders also reported the fraud charges to their local police. In addition", and the single most common underlying issue is "the cardholders told the Bank Representatives that they were gathering evidence to assist in the investigation and that they needed the Bank to contact the merchant to reverse or attain the identity of the airline ticket holders in order to assist the police in their investigation. Although being assured by Bank 's Customer Service representatives that their fraud investigators would contact the police and take 90 days to research the matter".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against stating that the cardholder approved the charges on the cardholder 's device is "the cardholders told the Bank Representatives that they were gathering evidence to assist in the investigation and that they needed the Bank to contact the merchant to reverse or attain the identity of the airline ticket holders in order to assist the police in their investigation. Although being assured by Bank 's Customer Service representatives that their fraud investigators would contact the police and take 90 days to research the matter" in the "the Bank began its fraud claim dispute process and claimed to investigate this matter. The cardholders also reported the fraud charges to their local police. In addition" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.