stating I owed them {$3800.00}. They sued me and won a default judgement citing that they had served me but did not. I was not properly served according to G.S.1-75.10 ( 5 ) and G.S. 1-75-11. I filed a motion Rule 60 and was not prepared due to the courts using XXXX

What the CFPB Record Shows About stating I owed them {$3800.00}. They sued me and won a default judgement citing that they had served me but did not. I was not properly served according to G.S.1-75.10 ( 5 ) and G.S. 1-75-11. I filed a motion Rule 60 and was not prepared due to the courts using XXXX

stating I owed them {$3800.00}. They sued me and won a default judgement citing that they had served me but did not. I was not properly served according to G.S.1-75.10 ( 5 ) and G.S. 1-75-11. I filed a motion Rule 60 and was not prepared due to the courts using XXXX has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Macy, and the most recent logged activity is Macy 's we, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, stating I owed them {$3800.00}. They sued me and won a default judgement citing that they had served me but did not. I was not properly served according to G.S.1-75.10 ( 5 ) and G.S. 1-75-11. I filed a motion Rule 60 and was not prepared due to the courts using XXXX reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "that the payment that they had just made would not reflect on the next statement. Therefore", and the single most common underlying issue is "making it look as if they did not meet the minimum payment requirement. This is an unethical business practice".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating stating I owed them {$3800.00}. They sued me and won a default judgement citing that they had served me but did not. I was not properly served according to G.S.1-75.10 ( 5 ) and G.S. 1-75-11. I filed a motion Rule 60 and was not prepared due to the courts using XXXX: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.