Total complaints
1
Filed since Afte
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows stated the correct Apt number's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Afte. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Afte
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How stated the correct Apt number's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I reviewed it and found several clear and obvious flaws '' in the core legal documentation. I noticed the following : JUDGMENT ( VOID ) : 1 ) The Proof of Service ( POS '' ) for the initial Small Claims document | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| it would still be a false and fraudulent statement ( needless to reference all the code/rules violations ) | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| was NOT served properly | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
stated the correct Apt number has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Afte, and the most recent logged activity is After acqu, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, stated the correct Apt number reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I reviewed it and found several clear and obvious flaws '' in the core legal documentation. I noticed the following : JUDGMENT ( VOID ) : 1 ) The Proof of Service ( POS '' ) for the initial Small Claims document", and the single most common underlying issue is "was NOT served properly".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating stated the correct Apt number: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
stated the correct Apt number has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
stated the correct Apt number has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against stated the correct Apt number is "was NOT served properly" in the "I reviewed it and found several clear and obvious flaws '' in the core legal documentation. I noticed the following : JUDGMENT ( VOID ) : 1 ) The Proof of Service ( POS '' ) for the initial Small Claims document" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.