2026 data Public-data reference. official source

so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since They. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
They
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since They

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). {$1100.00} dollars: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% {$1100.00} dollars 100.0%
  • {$1100.00} dollars 1 100.0% 0% relief

How so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
{$1100.00} dollars 1

Top States

State Complaints
they have provided false information to TransUnion and TransUnion is telling me that I need to contact the Department of Education 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
and that the account was closed on XXXX of XXXX. Which is false 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency

so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to They, and the most recent logged activity is They have , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "{$1100.00} dollars", and the single most common underlying issue is "and that the account was closed on XXXX of XXXX. Which is false".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency have?

so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency respond to complaints on time?

so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency?

The most common issue reported against so I certainly did not take out a loan in XXXX. Also it is illegal to state that a debt that was purchased by a collection agency is owed to the XXXX Department of Education when it is actually owed to the collection agency is "and that the account was closed on XXXX of XXXX. Which is false" in the "{$1100.00} dollars" product category.

Related