Total complaints
3
Filed since On o
3 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
3 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows she NEVER went passed her grace period ; being that the account was in my name's complaint history from CFPB public records. 3 consumers have filed complaints since On o. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
3
Filed since On o
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How she NEVER went passed her grace period ; being that the account was in my name's 3 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| it's stating XX/XX/2022 payment as being 30 days late. That's one major inaccuracy right there | 3 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I made sure of it. ( Attachments 5-16 : Mom 's Bank Statements for the Year ) So to reiterate | 3 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| no payment was ever late for any of the months ; therefore information being reported as 30 days late is incorrect. Please view supporting documents as proof of ALL payments for the full year of 2022 and have them update this inaccuracy accordingly. ( Attachments 1-4 : XXXX XXXX XXXXayment History for the year ) In addition | 1 |
| no payment was ever late for any of the months ; therefore information being reported as 30 days late is incorrect. Please view supporting documents as proof of ALL payments for the full year of XXXX and have them update this inaccuracy accordingly. ( Attachments 1-4 : XXXX XXXX Payment History for the year ) In addition | 1 |
| no payment was ever late for any of the months ; therefore information being reported as 30 days late is incorrect. Please view supporting documents as proof of ALL payments for the full year of XXXX and have them update this inaccuracy accordingly. ( Attachments 1-4 : TD Auto Payment History for the year ) In addition | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
she NEVER went passed her grace period ; being that the account was in my name has accumulated 3 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 3 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to On o, and the most recent logged activity is On one bur, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, she NEVER went passed her grace period ; being that the account was in my name reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "it's stating XX/XX/2022 payment as being 30 days late. That's one major inaccuracy right there", and the single most common underlying issue is "no payment was ever late for any of the months ; therefore information being reported as 30 days late is incorrect. Please view supporting documents as proof of ALL payments for the full year of 2022 and have them update this inaccuracy accordingly. ( Attachments 1-4 : XXXX XXXX XXXXayment History for the year ) In addition".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating she NEVER went passed her grace period ; being that the account was in my name: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
she NEVER went passed her grace period ; being that the account was in my name has received 3 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
she NEVER went passed her grace period ; being that the account was in my name has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against she NEVER went passed her grace period ; being that the account was in my name is "no payment was ever late for any of the months ; therefore information being reported as 30 days late is incorrect. Please view supporting documents as proof of ALL payments for the full year of 2022 and have them update this inaccuracy accordingly. ( Attachments 1-4 : XXXX XXXX XXXXayment History for the year ) In addition" in the "it's stating XX/XX/2022 payment as being 30 days late. That's one major inaccuracy right there" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.