2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since The . The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
The
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since The

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). breaking multiple: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% breaking multiple 100.0%
  • breaking multiple 1 100.0% 0% relief

How Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
breaking multiple MGL laws and even Ethical and professional conduct set by Supreme Judicial Court. I was not even informed when other two unit owners hire this firm. Currently I am under lawsuit with this law firm as well as other two unit owners. It is very important to note that 1

Top States

State Complaints
I sent complaint to Rushmore serving attached with this email as Complaint about making XXXX payment 2 '' in which I included the telephonic conversation I had with XXXX XXXX ( XXXX XXXX ) on XX/XX/XXXX. I also detailed the specific laws that were violated and forwarded the recent communication with lawyer of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. Subsequently I contacted customer care helpline several times and then on XX/XX/XXXX I wrote the second letter - attached with this email as Complaint about making XXXX payment 3 ''. In this email I included the conversation I had with XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ID # XXXX ) along with detailed letter sent to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX with XXXX attachments. I explained how the law firm has violated various chapters of Massachusetts General Law 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
which in-turn will be added to my monthly payment. Ever since XXXX XXXX and later other mortgage servicing companies 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX

Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to The , and the most recent logged activity is The escrow, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "breaking multiple MGL laws and even Ethical and professional conduct set by Supreme Judicial Court. I was not even informed when other two unit owners hire this firm. Currently I am under lawsuit with this law firm as well as other two unit owners. It is very important to note that", and the single most common underlying issue is "which in-turn will be added to my monthly payment. Ever since XXXX XXXX and later other mortgage servicing companies".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX have?

Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX respond to complaints on time?

Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX?

The most common issue reported against Rushmore servicing should have validated this claim before making the entire payment. When this matter came into my notice in XX/XX/XXXX is "which in-turn will be added to my monthly payment. Ever since XXXX XXXX and later other mortgage servicing companies" in the "breaking multiple MGL laws and even Ethical and professional conduct set by Supreme Judicial Court. I was not even informed when other two unit owners hire this firm. Currently I am under lawsuit with this law firm as well as other two unit owners. It is very important to note that" product category.

Related