Total complaints
3
Filed since ME :
3 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
3 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows reporting!!'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 3 consumers have filed complaints since ME :. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
3
Filed since ME :
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How reporting!!'s 3 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| paycheck garnishment to show correct hx. Disputed that NOWHERE on any report is any payment noted. Every month reports increased balance accrual and {$0.00} paid for that month..Thousands of dollars was paid from XXXX and there's no documentation on my reports. Comes back verified '' 2. There are 3 different date last active ''. XX/XX/XXXX | 3 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and XX/XX/XXXX. All 3 CRA is letting this account to be reaged especially with Equifax. Every month of reporting the date of first deliquency changes to that month. So in XX/XX/XXXX XXXX reported account in collection as updated status and XXXX XX/XX/XXXX. In XXXX reported account in collection for updated status with XXXX XX/XX/XXXX. My original removal date for time on report was XXXX and now it shows XXXX. Both CRA and creditor are violating my FCRA rights and what is happening is illegal and can be sued for. I have disputed the reaging '' and updated status every month and comes back verified ''. My credit score keeps in the XXXX range because EVERY month I have a new derogatory status ''. I have been denied auto loans | 1 |
| and XX/XX/XXXX. All XXXX CRA is letting this account to be reaged especially with XXXX. Every month of reporting the date of first deliquency changes to that month. So in XX/XX/XXXX XXXX reported account in collection as updated status and DOFD XX/XX/XXXX. In XXXX reported account in collection for updated status with XXXX XX/XX/XXXX. My original removal date for time on report was XXXX and now it shows XXXX. Both CRA and creditor are violating my FCRA rights and what is happening is illegal and can be sued for. I have disputed the reaging '' and updated status every month and comes back verified ''. My credit score keeps in the XXXX range because EVERY month I have a new derogatory status ''. I have been denied auto loans | 1 |
| and XX/XX/XXXX. All 3 CRA is letting this account to be reaged especially with XXXX. Every month of reporting the date of first deliquency changes to that month. So in XX/XX/XXXX XXXX reported account in collection as updated status and XXXX XX/XX/XXXX. In XXXX reported account in collection for updated status with XXXX XX/XX/XXXX. My original removal date for time on report was XXXX and now it shows XXXX. Both CRA and creditor are violating my FCRA rights and what is happening is illegal and can be sued for. I have disputed the reaging '' and updated status every month and comes back verified ''. My credit score keeps in the XXXX range because EVERY month I have a new derogatory status ''. I have been denied auto loans | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
reporting!! has accumulated 3 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 3 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to ME :, and the most recent logged activity is XXXX : I h, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, reporting!! reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "paycheck garnishment to show correct hx. Disputed that NOWHERE on any report is any payment noted. Every month reports increased balance accrual and {$0.00} paid for that month..Thousands of dollars was paid from XXXX and there's no documentation on my reports. Comes back verified '' 2. There are 3 different date last active ''. XX/XX/XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "and XX/XX/XXXX. All 3 CRA is letting this account to be reaged especially with Equifax. Every month of reporting the date of first deliquency changes to that month. So in XX/XX/XXXX XXXX reported account in collection as updated status and XXXX XX/XX/XXXX. In XXXX reported account in collection for updated status with XXXX XX/XX/XXXX. My original removal date for time on report was XXXX and now it shows XXXX. Both CRA and creditor are violating my FCRA rights and what is happening is illegal and can be sued for. I have disputed the reaging '' and updated status every month and comes back verified ''. My credit score keeps in the XXXX range because EVERY month I have a new derogatory status ''. I have been denied auto loans".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating reporting!!: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
reporting!! has received 3 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
reporting!! has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against reporting!! is "and XX/XX/XXXX. All 3 CRA is letting this account to be reaged especially with Equifax. Every month of reporting the date of first deliquency changes to that month. So in XX/XX/XXXX XXXX reported account in collection as updated status and XXXX XX/XX/XXXX. In XXXX reported account in collection for updated status with XXXX XX/XX/XXXX. My original removal date for time on report was XXXX and now it shows XXXX. Both CRA and creditor are violating my FCRA rights and what is happening is illegal and can be sued for. I have disputed the reaging '' and updated status every month and comes back verified ''. My credit score keeps in the XXXX range because EVERY month I have a new derogatory status ''. I have been denied auto loans" in the "paycheck garnishment to show correct hx. Disputed that NOWHERE on any report is any payment noted. Every month reports increased balance accrual and {$0.00} paid for that month..Thousands of dollars was paid from XXXX and there's no documentation on my reports. Comes back verified '' 2. There are 3 different date last active ''. XX/XX/XXXX" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.