2026 data Public-data reference. official source

re : misleading application process

2 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

2 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows re : misleading application process's complaint history from CFPB public records. 2 consumers have filed complaints since When. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

2
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
2
States Active
When
Since

Total complaints

2

Filed since When

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

re : misleading application process complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 2

re : misleading application process complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 2 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). I saw: 2 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% I saw 100.0%
  • I saw 2 100.0% 0% relief

How re : misleading application process's 2 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
I saw many terms I was not aware of during the application process 2

Top States

State Complaints
credit inquiry without full and complete disclosure or at least a warning. On XX/XX/2022 I called XXXX to determine the status 1
credit inquiry without full and complete disclosure or at least a warning. On XX/XX/2022 I called XXXX/Upgrade to determine the status 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
ie charges accrue immediately. I have no need for such a product and felt misled by the clever and timely marketing which I believe did not explain these terms. So I contacted XXXX by telephone to close the card and complain - and then found out that XXXX had made a credit inquiry related to this product. I checked on several credit monitoring sites and saw the hard inquiry - in talking with the agent at XXXX I was advised that I likely missed the disclosure about the credit hit that would follow after approval - which I do not believe occurred otherwise I would have abandoned the application and never would have accepted this product as its useless to me. The representative at XXXX offered to help by requesting a removal of the inquiry 1
ie charges accrue immediately. I have no need for such a product and felt misled by the clever and timely marketing which I believe did not explain these terms. So I contacted XXXXUpgrade by telephone to close the card and complain - and then found out that XXXX/Upgrade had made a credit inquiry related to this product. I checked on several credit monitoring sites and saw the hard inquiry - in talking with the agent at XXXX/Upgrade I was advised that I likely missed the disclosure about the credit hit that would follow after approval - which I do not believe occurred otherwise I would have abandoned the application and never would have accepted this product as its useless to me. The representative at XXXX/Upgrade offered to help by requesting a removal of the inquiry 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About re : misleading application process

re : misleading application process has accumulated 2 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 2 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 2 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to When, and the most recent logged activity is When the X, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, re : misleading application process reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I saw many terms I was not aware of during the application process", and the single most common underlying issue is "ie charges accrue immediately. I have no need for such a product and felt misled by the clever and timely marketing which I believe did not explain these terms. So I contacted XXXX by telephone to close the card and complain - and then found out that XXXX had made a credit inquiry related to this product. I checked on several credit monitoring sites and saw the hard inquiry - in talking with the agent at XXXX I was advised that I likely missed the disclosure about the credit hit that would follow after approval - which I do not believe occurred otherwise I would have abandoned the application and never would have accepted this product as its useless to me. The representative at XXXX offered to help by requesting a removal of the inquiry".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating re : misleading application process: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does re : misleading application process have?

re : misleading application process has received 2 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does re : misleading application process respond to complaints on time?

re : misleading application process has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about re : misleading application process?

The most common issue reported against re : misleading application process is "ie charges accrue immediately. I have no need for such a product and felt misled by the clever and timely marketing which I believe did not explain these terms. So I contacted XXXX by telephone to close the card and complain - and then found out that XXXX had made a credit inquiry related to this product. I checked on several credit monitoring sites and saw the hard inquiry - in talking with the agent at XXXX I was advised that I likely missed the disclosure about the credit hit that would follow after approval - which I do not believe occurred otherwise I would have abandoned the application and never would have accepted this product as its useless to me. The representative at XXXX offered to help by requesting a removal of the inquiry" in the "I saw many terms I was not aware of during the application process" product category.

Related