Total complaints
1
Filed since Unbe
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows OVER-THE-LIMIT FEES ARE GROSSLY LEGALLY EXCESSIVE ACCORDING TO THE XX/XX/XXXX CREDIT CARD ACT AND THE RESULT OF FRAUD. I WAS NOTABLY MUCH UNDER THE XXXX DOLLAR LIMIT WHEN I HANDED MY CARD TO XXXX AND THEN WAS FRAUDULENTLY OPTED IN BY XXXX AND VENDOR AND's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Unbe. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Unbe
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How OVER-THE-LIMIT FEES ARE GROSSLY LEGALLY EXCESSIVE ACCORDING TO THE XX/XX/XXXX CREDIT CARD ACT AND THE RESULT OF FRAUD. I WAS NOTABLY MUCH UNDER THE XXXX DOLLAR LIMIT WHEN I HANDED MY CARD TO XXXX AND THEN WAS FRAUDULENTLY OPTED IN BY XXXX AND VENDOR AND's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I WAS DEFRAUDED BY BOTH THE VENDOR AND XXXX ... ... ..THE CREDIT REPORT DOES NOT CONTAIN A DOFD OF XX/XX/XXXX AS REQUIRED BY FCRA THE PAYMENT TABLE IS ERRONEOUS | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| WITH ME NOT PRESENT | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| 60 ON XX/XX/XXXX 90 0N XX/XX/XXXX | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
OVER-THE-LIMIT FEES ARE GROSSLY LEGALLY EXCESSIVE ACCORDING TO THE XX/XX/XXXX CREDIT CARD ACT AND THE RESULT OF FRAUD. I WAS NOTABLY MUCH UNDER THE XXXX DOLLAR LIMIT WHEN I HANDED MY CARD TO XXXX AND THEN WAS FRAUDULENTLY OPTED IN BY XXXX AND VENDOR AND has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Unbe, and the most recent logged activity is Unbeknowns, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, OVER-THE-LIMIT FEES ARE GROSSLY LEGALLY EXCESSIVE ACCORDING TO THE XX/XX/XXXX CREDIT CARD ACT AND THE RESULT OF FRAUD. I WAS NOTABLY MUCH UNDER THE XXXX DOLLAR LIMIT WHEN I HANDED MY CARD TO XXXX AND THEN WAS FRAUDULENTLY OPTED IN BY XXXX AND VENDOR AND reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I WAS DEFRAUDED BY BOTH THE VENDOR AND XXXX ... ... ..THE CREDIT REPORT DOES NOT CONTAIN A DOFD OF XX/XX/XXXX AS REQUIRED BY FCRA THE PAYMENT TABLE IS ERRONEOUS", and the single most common underlying issue is "60 ON XX/XX/XXXX 90 0N XX/XX/XXXX".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating OVER-THE-LIMIT FEES ARE GROSSLY LEGALLY EXCESSIVE ACCORDING TO THE XX/XX/XXXX CREDIT CARD ACT AND THE RESULT OF FRAUD. I WAS NOTABLY MUCH UNDER THE XXXX DOLLAR LIMIT WHEN I HANDED MY CARD TO XXXX AND THEN WAS FRAUDULENTLY OPTED IN BY XXXX AND VENDOR AND: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
OVER-THE-LIMIT FEES ARE GROSSLY LEGALLY EXCESSIVE ACCORDING TO THE XX/XX/XXXX CREDIT CARD ACT AND THE RESULT OF FRAUD. I WAS NOTABLY MUCH UNDER THE XXXX DOLLAR LIMIT WHEN I HANDED MY CARD TO XXXX AND THEN WAS FRAUDULENTLY OPTED IN BY XXXX AND VENDOR AND has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
OVER-THE-LIMIT FEES ARE GROSSLY LEGALLY EXCESSIVE ACCORDING TO THE XX/XX/XXXX CREDIT CARD ACT AND THE RESULT OF FRAUD. I WAS NOTABLY MUCH UNDER THE XXXX DOLLAR LIMIT WHEN I HANDED MY CARD TO XXXX AND THEN WAS FRAUDULENTLY OPTED IN BY XXXX AND VENDOR AND has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against OVER-THE-LIMIT FEES ARE GROSSLY LEGALLY EXCESSIVE ACCORDING TO THE XX/XX/XXXX CREDIT CARD ACT AND THE RESULT OF FRAUD. I WAS NOTABLY MUCH UNDER THE XXXX DOLLAR LIMIT WHEN I HANDED MY CARD TO XXXX AND THEN WAS FRAUDULENTLY OPTED IN BY XXXX AND VENDOR AND is "60 ON XX/XX/XXXX 90 0N XX/XX/XXXX" in the "I WAS DEFRAUDED BY BOTH THE VENDOR AND XXXX ... ... ..THE CREDIT REPORT DOES NOT CONTAIN A DOFD OF XX/XX/XXXX AS REQUIRED BY FCRA THE PAYMENT TABLE IS ERRONEOUS" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.