2026 data Public-data reference. official source

or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Furt. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
Furt
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since Furt

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). Part 353: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% Part 353 100.0%
  • Part 353 1 100.0% 0% relief

How or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
Part 353 of BSA imposed a reporting obligation in a case where the institution detects any known or suspected federal criminal violation 1

Top States

State Complaints
and the FDIC-supervised institution has no substantial basis for identifying XXXX possible suspect or group of suspects Non-Compliance with KYC Obligations : I would like to bring to your attention that the aforementioned crypto company has failed to comply with KYC obligations as required by U.S. law. During my interaction with the company 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
committed or attempted against the FDIC-supervised institution or involving a transaction or transactions conducted through the FDIC-supervised institution 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction

or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Furt, and the most recent logged activity is Furthermor, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "Part 353 of BSA imposed a reporting obligation in a case where the institution detects any known or suspected federal criminal violation", and the single most common underlying issue is "committed or attempted against the FDIC-supervised institution or involving a transaction or transactions conducted through the FDIC-supervised institution".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction have?

or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction respond to complaints on time?

or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction?

The most common issue reported against or that the FDIC-supervised institution was used to facilitate a criminal transaction is "committed or attempted against the FDIC-supervised institution or involving a transaction or transactions conducted through the FDIC-supervised institution" in the "Part 353 of BSA imposed a reporting obligation in a case where the institution detects any known or suspected federal criminal violation" product category.

Related