2026 data Public-data reference. official source

oppress

6 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

6 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows oppress's complaint history from CFPB public records. 6 consumers have filed complaints since **I . The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

6
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
3
States Active
**I
Since

Total complaints

6

Filed since **I

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

oppress complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 6

oppress complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 6 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). 6: 2 complaints (33.3%), resolution 0.0% 6 33.3% XXXX: 1 complaints (16.7%), resolution 0.0% XXXX 16.7% but a: 1 complaints (16.7%), resolution 0.0% but a 16.7% including needless: 1 complaints (16.7%), resolution 0.0% including needless 16.7% but you: 1 complaints (16.7%), resolution 0.0% but you 16.7%
  • 6 2 33.3% 0% relief
  • XXXX 1 16.7% 0% relief
  • but a 1 16.7% 0% relief
  • including needless 1 16.7% 0% relief
  • but you 1 16.7% 0% relief

How oppress's 6 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
6 2
XXXX 1
but a request for VALIDATION made pursuant to 15 USC 1692g Sec. 809 ( b ) of the FDCPA. I respectfully request that your offices provide me with competent evidence that I have any legal obligation to pay you. You did not send me validation rather you sent me an account summary which I will provide a copy of what you sent here. You are malfeasant and need to be investigated. You did not halt all phone communications with XXXX XXXX and you called numerous times a day harassing for payment. Even after he advised to not call as he is an XXXX year old man with XXXX XXXX! 15 USC 1681b - FCRA - Under the permissible Purpose Law the original Creditor has a written agreement with the consumer to make your payments directly to them they do not have my permission/written consent to give out my information and sell it to a third party ( that being Portfolio Recovery Services 1
including needless attorney fees 1
but you are also requesting more money and double dipping on the money you received. House Joint Resolution 192 1

Top States

State Complaints
threaten 4
or abuse any person in connection with the collection of a debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing 1
or abuse Plaintiff 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
whichever is greater. Any person who procures a consumer report under false pretenses 2
XXXX 1
1917 ** ** Brady v. U.S. 1
but are not limited to : 1. Causing a telephone to ring repeatedly or continuously to annoy Plaintiff ( Cal Civ Code 1788.11 ( d ) ) ; 2. Communicating 1
1917** **Brady v. U.S. 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About oppress

oppress has accumulated 6 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 3 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 5 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to **I , and the most recent logged activity is This is NO, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, oppress reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "6", and the single most common underlying issue is "whichever is greater. Any person who procures a consumer report under false pretenses".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating oppress: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does oppress have?

oppress has received 6 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does oppress respond to complaints on time?

oppress has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about oppress?

The most common issue reported against oppress is "whichever is greater. Any person who procures a consumer report under false pretenses" in the "6" product category.

Related