Total complaints
1
Filed since On o
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows '' Omitting the fact that he is under a court order to pay XXXX XXXX for XXXX dependent's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since On o. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since On o
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How '' Omitting the fact that he is under a court order to pay XXXX XXXX for XXXX dependent's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| my husband submitted a refinance application to Village Capital & Investment | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Attempting to refinance marital property without court approval or mutual consent | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| without informing me or obtaining my required signature. This action occurred despite my name being listed on both the title and the mortgage. Furthermore | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
'' Omitting the fact that he is under a court order to pay XXXX XXXX for XXXX dependent has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to On o, and the most recent logged activity is On or abou, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, '' Omitting the fact that he is under a court order to pay XXXX XXXX for XXXX dependent reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "my husband submitted a refinance application to Village Capital & Investment", and the single most common underlying issue is "without informing me or obtaining my required signature. This action occurred despite my name being listed on both the title and the mortgage. Furthermore".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating '' Omitting the fact that he is under a court order to pay XXXX XXXX for XXXX dependent: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
'' Omitting the fact that he is under a court order to pay XXXX XXXX for XXXX dependent has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
'' Omitting the fact that he is under a court order to pay XXXX XXXX for XXXX dependent has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against '' Omitting the fact that he is under a court order to pay XXXX XXXX for XXXX dependent is "without informing me or obtaining my required signature. This action occurred despite my name being listed on both the title and the mortgage. Furthermore" in the "my husband submitted a refinance application to Village Capital & Investment" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.