2026 data Public-data reference. official source

obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information

3 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

3 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information's complaint history from CFPB public records. 3 consumers have filed complaints since EVID. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

3
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
EVID
Since

Total complaints

3

Filed since EVID

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 3

obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 3 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). XXXX XXXX: 3 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% XXXX XXXX 100.0%
  • XXXX XXXX 3 100.0% 0% relief

How obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information's 3 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
XXXX XXXX 3

Top States

State Complaints
causing ongoing credit score damage and financial harm. The pattern suggests systemic problems requiring regulatory oversight beyond individual complaint resolution. 3

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
XXXX XXXX XXXX 3

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information

obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information has accumulated 3 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 3 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to EVID, and the most recent logged activity is EVIDENCE O, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "XXXX XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "XXXX XXXX XXXX".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information have?

obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information has received 3 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information respond to complaints on time?

obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information?

The most common issue reported against obvious violations remain uncorrected Failure to Investigate Obvious Impossibilities : Geographic impossibilities ( SC cities with AZ zip codes ) remain after disputes Mathematically impossible balances persist after investigation Duplicate debt reporting continues despite clear evidence Inadequate TransUnion Reporting : TransUnion report provided contains only generic headers and promotional content No actual credit data provided despite request for complete report Failure to provide required disclosures under FCRA Section 609 PATTERN OF NON-COMPLIANCE : The high frequency of disputes across multiple accounts indicates either : Systematic data quality failures by furnishers Inadequate investigation procedures by credit reporting agencies Failure to implement corrective measures after identifying violations REQUESTED REGULATORY ACTION : Comprehensive audit of investigation procedures at all three bureaus Review of data furnisher accuracy standards and compliance Implementation of enhanced quality control measures Corrective action for all previously inadequately investigated disputes Regulatory monitoring of future dispute resolution processes CONSUMER IMPACT : The failure to properly investigate disputes has prolonged my exposure to inaccurate negative information is "XXXX XXXX XXXX" in the "XXXX XXXX" product category.

Related