Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows nothing was to change with my original terms of the note. Could NewRez please provide sufficient proof as to a cushion being added by my previous servicer 's of the loan? If not's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since On X. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How nothing was to change with my original terms of the note. Could NewRez please provide sufficient proof as to a cushion being added by my previous servicer 's of the loan? If not's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and that the escrow shortage would be paid over a 60 month period instead of a 12 month period. However | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| again it is illegal to change the terms of my original FHA note without my consent | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| rather my loan was sold to the from Ditech. The response also stated that NewRez confirmed that a cushion '' was included with my prior servicer and attached an annual escrow account disclosure statement '' from Ditech. However that statement explains a future escrow shortage and the two options I have to pay it. No where on the statement does it state of me having to have a cushion or needing a cushion to fund. Rather the statement ( which I did receive annually from Ditech ) states how I would like to pay my shortage | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
nothing was to change with my original terms of the note. Could NewRez please provide sufficient proof as to a cushion being added by my previous servicer 's of the loan? If not has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to On X, and the most recent logged activity is On XX/XX/2, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, nothing was to change with my original terms of the note. Could NewRez please provide sufficient proof as to a cushion being added by my previous servicer 's of the loan? If not reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "and that the escrow shortage would be paid over a 60 month period instead of a 12 month period. However", and the single most common underlying issue is "rather my loan was sold to the from Ditech. The response also stated that NewRez confirmed that a cushion '' was included with my prior servicer and attached an annual escrow account disclosure statement '' from Ditech. However that statement explains a future escrow shortage and the two options I have to pay it. No where on the statement does it state of me having to have a cushion or needing a cushion to fund. Rather the statement ( which I did receive annually from Ditech ) states how I would like to pay my shortage".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating nothing was to change with my original terms of the note. Could NewRez please provide sufficient proof as to a cushion being added by my previous servicer 's of the loan? If not: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
nothing was to change with my original terms of the note. Could NewRez please provide sufficient proof as to a cushion being added by my previous servicer 's of the loan? If not has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
nothing was to change with my original terms of the note. Could NewRez please provide sufficient proof as to a cushion being added by my previous servicer 's of the loan? If not has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against nothing was to change with my original terms of the note. Could NewRez please provide sufficient proof as to a cushion being added by my previous servicer 's of the loan? If not is "rather my loan was sold to the from Ditech. The response also stated that NewRez confirmed that a cushion '' was included with my prior servicer and attached an annual escrow account disclosure statement '' from Ditech. However that statement explains a future escrow shortage and the two options I have to pay it. No where on the statement does it state of me having to have a cushion or needing a cushion to fund. Rather the statement ( which I did receive annually from Ditech ) states how I would like to pay my shortage" in the "and that the escrow shortage would be paid over a 60 month period instead of a 12 month period. However" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.